Skip to main content

Security report for uww.org

United World Wrestling · Other · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

United World Wrestling (UWW) is the international governing body for amateur wrestling, overseeing both Greco-Roman and freestyle wrestling disciplines. The organization operates as a non-profit entity with a global reach, providing governance, event organization, and promotion of wrestling worldwide. The website serves as the official digital presence for UWW, targeting athletes, sports organizations, and fans of wrestling. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Nuxt.js framework, AWS hosting infrastructure, and popular JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. However, some accessibility features appear basic, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided content. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business credibility score. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies and security headers slightly reduce the security and privacy posture scores. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uww.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uww.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
629
Employees
7
Customers
590
Third parties
32
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-11 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uww.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –athena.uww.org2026-06-11
  • –athena.uww.org2026-06-08
  • –athena.uww.org2026-06-01
  • –athena.uww.org2026-05-16
  • –athena.uww.org2025-08-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UWW holds a strong market position as the official international governing body for amateur wrestling, a niche but globally recognized sport. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on governance, event management, and sport promotion. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, event hosting, and partnerships. The target audience includes athletes, national wrestling federations, sports fans, and media. The organization benefits from a long-established domain and consistent branding. Partnerships with major sports and media entities are implied but not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are active, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
United World Wrestling
Description
United World Wrestling (UWW) is the international governing body for the sport of amateur wrestling, both for Greco-Roman wrestling and freestyle wrestling.
Key services
Governance of amateur wrestling, Organization of wrestling events and championships, Promotion of wrestling disciplines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AWS DNS, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (possible CDN), Swiper.js (carousel library), OpenSans font, Fedra-SansConds font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Social media platforms are linked via external domains but no explicit social media URLs found in snippet.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and fonts with responsive design.
  6. Security headers and policies are not explicitly visible in the provided content.
  7. WHOIS data indicates a well-established domain with no privacy protection.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js, with hosting on AWS infrastructure. It uses popular JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and security headers would reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uww.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uww.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.