Skip to main content

Security report for userevidence.com

UserEvidence · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UserEvidence is a specialized Customer Evidence Platform targeting B2B software, product, and hardware companies. The platform focuses on automating the collection and curation of customer feedback, success stories, and verified case studies to support go-to-market teams. The company was founded in 2020, and its website reflects a professional SaaS business model with a clear focus on social proof and marketing automation services. The target audience is primarily B2B organizations seeking to enhance their customer validation and marketing collateral. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and leverages modern marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Google Cloud and domain registration via Squarespace Domains, indicating a reliable infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, with SEO best practices implemented through Yoast SEO Premium. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. Cookie consent is actively managed, but there is a lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No security headers were detected in the provided content, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, UserEvidence presents a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its market niche. The absence of direct contact information and formal privacy or terms pages in the analyzed content slightly reduces privacy compliance scores. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of userevidence.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching userevidence.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UserEvidence occupies a niche in the B2B SaaS market focused on customer evidence and social proof automation. Its competitive advantage lies in automating the generation of verified case studies and testimonials, which are critical for GTM teams in software and hardware sectors. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting mid-size to small enterprises. The company appears to have a focused partnership ecosystem with integrations to marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot and LinkedIn. Growth indicators include the use of advanced marketing tools and a modern website infrastructure. However, the lack of visible contact details and formal policies may impact customer trust and conversion. The company should consider expanding transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The security posture of UserEvidence is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, though no direct vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response information to improve security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to engage with security researchers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UserEvidence
Description
UserEvidence is the Customer Evidence Platform that lets you collect feedback, curate success stories, and create content that credibly proves the value of your product.
Key services
Collect feedback, Curate success stories, Create verified case studies, Generate testimonials and stats
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.29.0, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sequel video toolkit
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Squarespace Domains (Registrar), Google Cloud DNS (Name servers)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain statuses clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads (hsadspixel.net)
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, G2 tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  5. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts present indicating extensive user tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. Website content is professional and targeted at B2B SaaS customers.
  9. Domain registration and technical setup appear legitimate and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The domain is registered with Squarespace Domains and DNS is managed via Google Cloud name servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve technical security by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS business but could benefit from enhanced security hardening and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with userevidence.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review userevidence.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.