Skip to main content

Security report for usercentrics.eu

Usercentrics GmbH · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Usercentrics GmbH is a medium-sized technology company founded in 2013, specializing in advanced data privacy and regulatory compliance solutions. Their core offering is a Consent Management Platform (CMP) that enables businesses to meet privacy requirements, manage user consent, and secure monetization. Positioned as a leading provider in the data privacy sector, Usercentrics targets businesses requiring compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript technologies, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and Usercentrics' own consent management scripts. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good performance metrics. Hosting and domain registration are stable and consistent with the business profile. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements consent-based data collection practices. However, there is room for improvement by enabling DNSSEC, publishing explicit privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact information for incident response. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected. Overall, Usercentrics.com presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a strong focus on privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency with published policies and contact details, enabling DNSSEC, and formalizing security incident response information to further strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of usercentrics.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching usercentrics.eu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention usercentrics.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
974
Employees
0
Customers
974
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for usercentrics.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Usercentrics operates in the technology sector, providing B2B SaaS solutions focused on data privacy and compliance. Their market positioning as a leading CMP provider gives them competitive advantages in regulatory-driven markets. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their platform and related services. The target customer segments are businesses needing GDPR and privacy compliance solutions, spanning multiple industries. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, active marketing via Google Tag Manager, and social media presence. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with various platforms, although no explicit partner domains were identified in the HTML content. The company demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with its business operations.

Security posture

Usercentrics exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and consent management integrated to comply with privacy regulations. The use of ads data redaction and granular consent settings indicates attention to privacy best practices. The absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps that could be addressed. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not explicitly documented on the site. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly linked from the homepage.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for security issues.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Usercentrics GmbH
Description
Usercentrics offers advanced solutions for data privacy and regulatory compliance. Meet privacy requirements, manage user consent, and secure monetization.
Key services
Data privacy solutions, Regulatory compliance, User consent management, Monetization security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, Robots meta tag, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent management with granular consent settings
  • Ads data redaction enabled by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Consent management scripts actively used
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in main HTML content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Strong branding and professional design
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing
  7. Domain registered with reputable registrar and has stable DNS configuration
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including JavaScript modules and Google Tag Manager integration. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, and mobile optimization is excellent. Accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines and semantic HTML are present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting is stable with IONOS SE as registrar. Technical risks are minimal but include the lack of DNSSEC and absence of explicit security headers in the provided data. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100 −3Low27 findingsView report
  2. 81/100 +4Low25 findingsView report
  3. 77/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with usercentrics.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review usercentrics.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.