Skip to main content

Security report for usercentrics.eu

Usercentrics · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Usercentrics is an established enterprise software company founded in 2013, specializing in data privacy and regulatory compliance solutions. Their core offering is a Consent Management Platform (CMP) that helps businesses meet privacy requirements, manage user consent, and secure monetization. The company positions itself as a leader in the data privacy technology market, targeting businesses that require compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The website reflects a mature SaaS business model with a focus on privacy and compliance technology. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics' own CMP scripts. The site is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms implemented, although some improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers could enhance security further. Privacy compliance is good but could be improved by explicitly linking privacy policies and terms of service. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a trustworthy and professional enterprise with a strong market presence in the privacy compliance sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching usercentrics.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention usercentrics.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
974
Employees
0
Customers
974
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for usercentrics.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Usercentrics operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on privacy compliance and consent management. Their business model is SaaS, providing software solutions to enterprises needing to comply with data privacy laws. The company has a strong market position as a leading CMP provider, supported by a consistent brand and professional online presence. The target audience includes businesses across various industries requiring GDPR and other regulatory compliance. The company appears to have a global reach with localized website versions. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their CMP services. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major ad and analytics platforms like Google. Strategic observations suggest Usercentrics is well positioned to capitalize on increasing privacy regulation demands worldwide.

Security posture

The security maturity of Usercentrics' website is solid, with HTTPS enforced and advanced consent management scripts controlling data collection and ad personalization. The site uses Google Tag Manager with consent defaults set to denied, then granted based on region, demonstrating privacy-aware tracking. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not explicitly published, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture aligns with industry best practices for a privacy-focused SaaS provider but could benefit from additional security hardening and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service linked from the homepage.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  5. Provide explicit contact information including security incident contacts to improve trust and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Usercentrics
Description
Usercentrics offers advanced solutions for data privacy and regulatory compliance. Meet privacy requirements, manage user consent, and secure monetization.
Key services
Data privacy solutions, Regulatory compliance, User consent management, Monetization security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, JavaScript ES Modules, Roboto font, CSS Grid and Flexbox
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management with granular consent settings
  • Ads data redaction enabled by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and is well optimized for performance and mobile.
  2. Strong focus on data privacy and compliance solutions.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Consent management is implemented with advanced granular controls.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook with domain verification meta tag.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end using CSS Grid, Flexbox, and ES Modules for JavaScript. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags, integrated with Usercentrics' own consent management scripts. The site is optimized for performance with preloading of fonts and scripts, and responsive design for mobile devices. Hosting is via IONOS SE with stable DNS infrastructure. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility practices. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS security. The site demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure suitable for an enterprise SaaS provider.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 81/100 +4Low25 findingsView report
  3. 77/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with usercentrics.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review usercentrics.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.