Skip to main content

Security report for uptick.network

Uptick Network · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uptick Network is a technology company focused on building a comprehensive Web3 infrastructure and ecosystem tailored for the real economy. Their platform supports NFTs and real-world assets with multi-chain interoperability, offering services such as the Uptick Marketplace, Upward Wallet, and Vouch for verifiable credentials. The website demonstrates a professional design with clear navigation and consistent branding, targeting asset issuers, creators, collectors, and developers interested in Web3 technologies. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks published security policies or vulnerability disclosures. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uptick.network

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uptick Network positions itself as an important player in the Web3 infrastructure space, focusing on NFT and real-world asset tokenization with cross-chain interoperability. Their business model revolves around the UPTICK token as a utility and governance token, supporting a broad ecosystem including marketplaces, wallets, and credential issuance platforms. The company engages developers and community members through GitHub, documentation, and Discord channels, indicating an open and collaborative approach. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details limits full business credibility assessment but the presence of multiple ecosystem applications and partnerships suggests a medium-sized operation with growth potential.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security best practices such as no visible sensitive data exposure and absence of vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust in the Web3 space. The use of Google Analytics without a cookie consent mechanism indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by publishing security policies, adding contact channels for security incidents, and implementing privacy compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to enhance transparency and user trust.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uptick Network
Description
Uptick Network is building a business-focused Web3 infrastructure and ecosystem for the real economy. The platform supports a full range of NFT and RWA standards with emphasis on advanced Web3 business protocols, multi-chain and cross-chain interoperability. It offers Uptick Infrastructure, Uptick Marketplace, and Uptick Ecosystem to bring fairness, transparency, and economic sovereignty into everyday life.
Key services
Uptick Infrastructure, Uptick Marketplace, Upward Wallet (non-custodial digital wallet), Vouch (verifiable credentials and decentralized identifiers platform), Developer tools and ecosystem support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, WOW.js, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected to collect user data on main pages

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are linked or found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided on the website.
  4. Strong focus on Web3 infrastructure, NFT marketplace, and developer ecosystem.
  5. Use of Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No forms detected on main pages, reducing risk of data collection vulnerabilities.
  7. Multiple external links to GitHub, documentation, Discord, and blog for community engagement.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies disclosed.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and consistent branding. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the absence of CMS or hosting provider information limits deeper infrastructure insights. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and SEO metadata to enhance reach and usability. No technical vulnerabilities or deprecated libraries were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uptick.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uptick.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.