Skip to main content

Security report for upcity.com

UpCity · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UpCity operates a well-established B2B marketplace platform that connects businesses with verified and credible service providers across multiple sectors including marketing, IT services, and development. The company emphasizes trust through verified reviews and quality assurance badges, positioning itself as a reliable partner for businesses seeking professional services. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging WordPress CMS, React components, and integrations with HubSpot and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is managed via Amazon AWS, ensuring scalability and reliability. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, domain transfer protections, and a public vulnerability disclosure program, although some security headers and incident response contacts could be improved. Overall, the platform is professional, user-friendly, and optimized for SEO and accessibility, supporting a broad audience of business users. The domain age and registration data corroborate the company's legitimacy and market presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of upcity.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upcity.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention upcity.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
297
Employees
2
Customers
292
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-04-24 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for upcity.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –upcity.com2026-04-24
  • –upcity.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UpCity holds a competitive position as a trusted intermediary in the B2B services market, leveraging verified reviews to differentiate from competitors. Its business model centers on connecting service providers with businesses, generating value through visibility and credibility enhancement. The company targets medium to large businesses seeking marketing, IT, and development services. Partnerships with recognized media and a strong social media presence support brand awareness. The platform's extensive service categories and geographic listings indicate a broad market reach. Revenue likely derives from service provider subscriptions or lead generation fees. The company’s long domain history and consistent branding reinforce market trust and stability.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure program linked to Gartner indicates a proactive approach to security. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and security.txt files are absent, representing areas for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contact information is not publicly detailed, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security measures align with industry best practices but could be strengthened with additional headers and clearer incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Implement explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UpCity
Description
At UpCity, we create and empower successful relationships between businesses and B2B service providers. Find your next partner today!
Key services
Service provider listings, Verified reviews, B2B marketplace, Marketing and advertising services, IT and development services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Themify Builder, jQuery
Frameworks
React, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Verified reviews to prevent fake content
  • Vulnerability disclosure program linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern technologies and frameworks.
  2. Strong SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  3. Comprehensive verified review system enhances trust.
  4. Social media presence is active and consistent.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  6. Domain registration and hosting are professional and stable.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable technology stack combining WordPress CMS with React for interactive components. It uses popular SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, HubSpot Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable and performant hosting. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and clear navigation. The use of multiple CSS and JS libraries is well-managed, and no broken elements were detected. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upcity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upcity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.