Skip to main content

Security report for unspam.com

Unspam Technologies, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Unspam Technologies, Inc. is a specialized company focused on anti-spam legislation consulting and the deployment of do-not-contact registries for various communication channels including email, fax, mobile phones, and instant messaging. The company also supports compliance with child protection registry laws and operates Project Honey Pot, a notable email address harvester monitoring network used by large ISPs. Their market position is that of a leader in this niche, serving government clients and companies seeking compliance solutions. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, showing moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or CMS usage. The site lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, and the SSL/HTTPS status is unknown from the provided data. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating minimal tracking. From a security perspective, the site does not expose sensitive data and shows no obvious vulnerabilities in the HTML content. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. The website content is professional and consistent with the business claims, but the discrepancy in domain registration information reduces overall trust. Overall, the website is functional and informative but would benefit from improved security practices, verified domain registration, and enhanced privacy compliance to strengthen its credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unspam.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Unspam Technologies operates in a specialized segment of the technology sector focused on anti-spam and child protection compliance. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing Project Honey Pot and government registry deployments. The business model revolves around consulting and providing registry infrastructure. The target customers are government agencies and companies requiring compliance with anti-spam and child protection laws. The company appears small in size with a history dating back to 2001, although domain registration data is missing. Partnerships with government registries and affiliated sites strengthen their ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent press coverage and registry expansions. Strategic observations suggest a need to improve domain legitimacy and security posture to maintain market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but incomplete. The website lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance indicators suggests gaps in GDPR and related regulations. While no immediate vulnerabilities are visible, the missing domain WHOIS data and lack of security best practices reduce the overall security posture. The business impact of these gaps includes potential trust erosion and compliance risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Provide clear security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Unspam Technologies, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Unspam Technologies, Inc.
Description
Unspam Technologies, Inc. provides consulting and contracting services for anti-spam legislation, specializing in do-not-contact registries for email, fax, mobile phone, and instant messenger. They assist governments and companies in compliance with child protection registry laws and operate Project Honey Pot, an email address harvester monitoring network.
Key services
Do-not-contact registry infrastructure, Compliance consulting for anti-spam and child protection laws, Project Honey Pot email harvester monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing, raising domain legitimacy concerns
  3. Website provides detailed business and contact information
  4. No cookie consent or tracking detected
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status visible from provided data
  6. Content is safe and professional with no adult or questionable material
  7. External links point to relevant partner and registry sites
  8. No social media links found in content
  9. No forms with fields detected except a contact page link
  10. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The design is basic with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or content delivery networks. The site lacks accessibility features and SEO optimization is basic. Technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience, security, and compliance. The absence of analytics and tracking reduces data-driven insights but also limits privacy concerns.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unspam.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unspam.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.