Skip to main content

Security report for unixtimestamp.com

Dan's Tools · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website unixtimestamp.com is a specialized online tool focused on Unix timestamp and epoch conversion, targeting developers and programmers. It offers utilities for converting timestamps and provides references for date and time functions across programming languages. The site is part of the Dan's Tools suite, indicating a niche market position as a provider of developer utilities. The business model appears to be based on free tool offerings monetized through advertising and analytics. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with jQuery, Moment.js for date handling, and Fomantic UI for styling. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and Google AdSense for advertising revenue. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and functional forms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and the WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or malicious content were found. Overall, the site is a useful and professional resource for developers but would benefit from improved domain registration transparency and enhanced security headers to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unixtimestamp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Unixtimestamp.com operates as a small technology entity providing free developer tools focused on time and date conversions. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized niche and integration within the Dan's Tools ecosystem. Revenue is likely generated through advertising and possibly affiliate links. The target customers are developers needing quick timestamp conversions and references. The site shows steady content quality and consistent branding but lacks explicit business registration details. Partnerships appear limited to related Dan's Tools domains. Growth potential depends on expanding tool offerings and improving trust signals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. The missing WHOIS data is a significant trust concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with better domain management and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  3. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct usability testing to improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dan's Tools
Description
Epoch and unix timestamp converter for developers. Date and time function syntax reference for various programming languages.
Key services
Unix timestamp conversion, Date and time function syntax reference, Related developer utilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Moment.js, Fomantic UI, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Fomantic UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Uses HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Consent management for cookies and personal data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a specialized developer tool for Unix timestamp conversion.
  2. Content is well structured with clear forms and conversion utilities.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and UI frameworks.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Google AdSense for tracking and monetization.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent management.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL assumed but not verified.
  9. No signs of adult or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid technical foundation using standard web technologies and popular libraries such as jQuery and Moment.js. The use of Fomantic UI provides a responsive and modern UI framework. Hosting assets on Cloudfront CDN improves performance and availability. The site loads external fonts and icons efficiently. However, no CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unixtimestamp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unixtimestamp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.