Skip to main content

Security report for ulule.com

Ulule · Other · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ulule is a professional crowdfunding platform focused on enabling creative and sustainable projects. It offers crowdfunding services, certified training courses, and a store featuring sustainable brands. The platform targets creators, entrepreneurs, and individuals seeking to launch and finance projects, positioning itself as a top service in its niche. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using Next.js, React, and integrates analytics and error monitoring tools such as Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, and Sentry. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of monitoring tools, though explicit security headers and policies are not evident in the provided content. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which limits transparency but is common for commercial sites. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, and the site content is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ulule.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ulule operates in the crowdfunding sector with a focus on sustainable and creative projects. Its business model includes project launching, training, and a sustainable brand store, catering to a medium-sized audience primarily in France. The platform leverages customer trust through integration of Trustpilot reviews and B Corp certification signals. The company uses modern web technologies and analytics to optimize user engagement and performance. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies in the visible content suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The platform's market position as a top service for project financing and training indicates a competitive advantage in its niche.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable monitoring and analytics services, indicating a mature security posture. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps that could be addressed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain transparency but does not directly imply risk. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Provide a security.txt file or a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ulule
Description
Ulule makes it easy to take action and develop creative, sustainable projects. Crowdfunding, certified training courses and a store of sustainable brands.
Key services
Crowdfunding, Certified training courses, Store of sustainable brands
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Typekit fonts, Sentry (error tracking), Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Plausible for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML content
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Trustpilot reviews widget present indicating customer feedback integration
  7. Social media links are present in meta tags but no explicit social media URLs found in visible content
  8. Website content is focused on crowdfunding and sustainable projects
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks for server-side rendering and client-side interactivity. It uses Typekit for fonts and integrates multiple analytics and monitoring services including Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, and Sentry. The site is mobile-optimized and shows good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance appears moderate with preloading of CSS and images. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. The technical stack is modern and well-structured, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ulule.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ulule.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.