Skip to main content

Security report for ultrasound.money

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ultrasound.money is a specialized web platform providing real-time analytics and visualizations related to Ethereum's monetary supply, issuance, burn rates, and gas fees. The site targets Ethereum users, investors, and blockchain enthusiasts interested in tracking ETH as 'ultra sound money'. The platform leverages modern web technologies such as React and Next.js to deliver a responsive and visually appealing user experience. While the site is technically sound with HTTPS enabled and good mobile optimization, it lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information, which impacts its overall trustworthiness and privacy posture. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for small informational sites, but no registrant details are publicly available. Security headers are missing, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ultrasound.money

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the technology sector, focusing on blockchain analytics for Ethereum. It provides niche services including ETH supply tracking, issuance and burn statistics, gas fee monitoring, and long-term supply projections. The business model appears informational, likely monetized through community engagement or indirect means rather than direct sales. The site positions itself as a go-to resource for Ethereum monetary metrics, targeting a specialized audience of crypto investors and enthusiasts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident, and the site is likely a small-scale operation. The lack of explicit business and contact information limits transparency but does not detract from the site's utility within its niche.

Security posture

The security posture of ultrasound.money is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or inputs collecting sensitive data are present, minimizing attack surface. The site does not expose sensitive information or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. The lack of incident response contact information and security policies is a gap in security governance. Enhancing security headers and publishing security and privacy policies would improve the site's security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels for security and abuse reporting.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities in the tech stack.
  5. Enhance transparency by including business information and trust indicators to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website focused on tracking Ethereum (ETH) supply, issuance, burn, gas fees, and projections related to ETH becoming 'ultra sound money'.
Key services
Real-time ETH supply tracking, ETH issuance and burn statistics, Gas fee monitoring, Projections of ETH supply over time
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Fonts, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized analytics platform for Ethereum monetary metrics.
  2. No contact or legal policy pages detected.
  3. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no public registrant info.
  4. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  5. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  7. No forms collecting personal data detected.
  8. Site uses modern React/Next.js framework with good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

Ultrasound.money is built using modern web technologies, primarily React and Next.js, which support server-side rendering and improved performance. The site uses Google Fonts and SVG graphics for styling and icons. The HTML structure is well-formed with responsive design considerations, ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some data loading placeholders indicating dynamic content fetching. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the source. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features but maintains a clean and consistent design. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and accessibility could enhance user experience and discoverability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ultrasound.money. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ultrasound.money.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.