Skip to main content

Security report for uicore.co

UiCore PRO · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UiCore PRO is a professional WordPress theme provider offering a comprehensive subscription-based service that includes unlimited website creation, a powerful theme and page builder, and a vast design cloud library. The company targets marketers and agencies seeking modern, customizable WordPress themes with WooCommerce support and white-label capabilities. The website is well-positioned in the market with over 20,000 users and endorsements from reputable web design blogs, indicating strong market presence and trust. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with Elementor as the page builder, enhanced by modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Sendinblue. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating areas for improvement in compliance and security hardening. The absence of WHOIS registrant data is due to TLD limitations but is mitigated by the professional nature of the site and privacy protection justification. Overall, UiCore PRO presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include implementing explicit security headers, adding cookie consent for privacy compliance, and publishing a security policy with incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uicore.co

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UiCore PRO operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on WordPress theme development and digital design resources. Its subscription model provides recurring revenue streams targeting agencies and marketers. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem with related domains for support, documentation, and user account management. The extensive template library and builder widgets offer competitive advantages. Growth indicators include frequent template updates and a growing user base. The business model emphasizes ease of use, customization, and white-labeling, appealing to professional users seeking scalable website solutions.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive information. The use of modern libraries and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations, though explicit cookie consent is missing. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected. Incident response and security policy information are absent, which could impact readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting best practices in headers and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing business contact emails and phone numbers for customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UiCore PRO
Description
Create unlimited websites, tailor themes to your brand, and access all UiCore Framework features with our affordable yearly subscription.
Key services
WordPress theme development, Page and theme builder tools, Design cloud and template library, WooCommerce integration, White-label customization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Sendinblue
Frameworks
UiCore Framework v6, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern libraries and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Sendinblue
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured with clear business focus.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing tools.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, which is a minor compliance gap.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD not supported, but no negative indicators found.
  6. Multiple endorsements and testimonials enhance trustworthiness.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor as the primary page builder, supported by UiCore Framework version 6. It employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Sendinblue. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with well-structured metadata and SEO enhancements via Yoast SEO plugin. No technical debt or deprecated technologies are evident. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses lazy loading for images and modern CSS for animations and layout, indicating a contemporary technical stack.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uicore.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uicore.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.