Skip to main content

Security report for turnip.gg

Turnip · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Turnip is a technology company focused on empowering gaming communities through a platform that enables users to build, join, and interact within gaming clubs and livestream mobile games with ease. The company offers mobile applications available on both Google Play and the Apple App Store, positioning itself as a niche player in the gaming community engagement and livestreaming market. The website content is professionally designed and clearly communicates the business purpose and key services, targeting gamers and content creators seeking interactive community experiences. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL encryption. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks important security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or explicit GDPR compliance indicators. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website presents a moderate security posture with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would enhance trust and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching turnip.gg

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Turnip operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting the gaming community niche. Its business model revolves around providing a platform and mobile apps for gamers and creators to build communities, participate in interactive events, and livestream mobile games. The company leverages app store distribution channels and social media to reach its audience. The presence of a careers page and featured news indicates growth and active market engagement. Partnerships or integrations with platforms like Notion for open roles suggest a modern, collaborative operational approach. Revenue streams likely include app monetization and possibly creator support mechanisms. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and positions itself as an innovative player in gaming community engagement.

Security posture

The security posture of Turnip's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness communication. Privacy compliance is incomplete, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and explicit GDPR adherence statements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content or scripts. The minimal use of third-party scripts reduces attack surface but also limits analytics and marketing capabilities. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Turnip
Description
Empowering gaming communities to run, discover and join interactive experiences.
Key services
Gaming community building, Interactive event participation, Mobile game livestreaming with overlays and real-time interaction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Mobile apps (iOS and Android)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and focused on gaming community engagement.
  3. No forms detected on the main page; contact is via email link only.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. Social media presence is active with Instagram, Discord, Twitter, and Facebook links.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and Webflow scripts.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with an active domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web fonts and jQuery 3.5.1 for frontend functionality. Hosting is managed by Webflow, providing SSL and reliable delivery. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and layout. Performance is moderate, with no significant delays or errors detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, the site lacks advanced analytics integration and cookie management tools. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved security configurations and enhanced accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with turnip.gg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review turnip.gg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.