Skip to main content

Security report for truyo.ai

Truyo · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Truyo is a mature technology company founded in 2011, specializing in AI governance and compliance solutions. Their platform offers comprehensive tools to identify, assess, and mitigate AI risks, ensuring organizations adopt AI responsibly and in compliance with evolving regulations. The company targets enterprises and organizations seeking to manage AI usage, risk, and regulatory compliance effectively. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates advanced features such as AI model validation, data de-identification, and framework assessments. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile-friendly, and uses reputable third-party services like Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for analytics and marketing. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and shows no signs of vulnerabilities, although DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, Truyo presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound digital presence aligned with its business focus on AI governance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching truyo.ai

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Truyo operates in the AI governance technology sector, offering a SaaS platform that addresses the growing need for AI risk management and regulatory compliance. Their market position is strengthened by a holistic approach covering AI inventory, risk assessment, model validation, and policy management. The company leverages partnerships, such as with IntraEdge, and maintains certifications that enhance credibility. Their business model focuses on enterprise clients requiring scalable AI governance solutions. The website content and structure indicate a strong emphasis on education and customer support through resources like blogs, webinars, and FAQs. The presence of multiple social media channels and a trust center further supports their market engagement and brand trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and the X-Frame-Options header set to DENY, protecting against clickjacking. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and the use of reputable hosting and DNS providers adds to infrastructure security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. There is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The site uses secure forms via HubSpot, but no dedicated security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page was found. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Truyo
Description
Truyo AI Governance platform helps you scan and mitigate AI risks to ensure strict compliance for your AI usage and common AI use cases.
Key services
AI Governance, AI Inventory and Risk Management, Model Validation, Scramble & De-identify Data, Framework Assessments, Notices & Policies Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Slick Slider, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Tag Manager, Lottie Web Animations, HubSpot Forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • X-Frame-Options header set to DENY
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress and headers)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.
  2. Strong focus on AI governance and compliance solutions.
  3. Comprehensive resource and FAQ sections enhance user engagement.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and good SEO practices.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  6. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.
  8. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on the page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses modern libraries such as Slick Slider for carousels, AOS for animations, and Lottie for vector animations. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, and HubSpot forms handle lead capture and user interaction. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices, including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized fonts. There is room for improvement in security headers and DNS configuration. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with truyo.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review truyo.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.