Skip to main content

Security report for triggle.app

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at triggle.app is currently inaccessible or blocked, displaying only a minimal JSON error message indicating a missing authentication token. This suggests the URL may be an API endpoint or a backend service requiring authentication rather than a public-facing website. Due to the lack of accessible content, no business description, contact information, or policies are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure cannot be assessed beyond the indication that the site is not publicly accessible without credentials. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and any visible security or privacy policies indicates a very low security posture. The lack of accessible content also prevents evaluation of compliance with GDPR or other regulations. The domain's WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but, combined with the lack of public business information, reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. The primary risk is the inability to verify the legitimacy or security of the service behind the domain. Strategic recommendations include enabling public access to a landing page with business and compliance information, implementing HTTPS and security headers, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching triggle.app

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be used for backend or API services rather than a traditional business website. No market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue models are discernible. No partnerships or ecosystem details are available. The lack of contact or company data suggests the domain is either in early development, restricted to internal use, or improperly configured for public access.

Security posture

The security posture is currently very weak or unknown due to the lack of accessible content and metadata. No HTTPS confirmation or security headers were detected. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site returns a 'Missing Authentication Token' message, indicating authentication is required but not provided, which may be a security control but also blocks analysis. The privacy protected WHOIS data adds a layer of anonymity but reduces transparency. Overall, the site does not demonstrate adherence to security best practices or compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable a public-facing landing page with clear business and contact information.
  2. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and enforce secure connections.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Provide vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Minimal content with JSON message 'Missing Authentication Token' indicates blocked or inaccessible content, likely due to missing authentication or API gateway restriction. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible or blocked, showing only a JSON error message.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or meaningful HTML content found.
  3. No contact information, policies, or business details present.
  4. No external links or social media profiles detected.
  5. No scripts or technologies detected from the minimal HTML.
  6. No security headers or SSL information available from provided data.
  7. Likely an API endpoint or backend service URL rather than a public website.
  8. Analysis incomplete due to blocked content and lack of data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website content is minimal and consists solely of a JSON error message indicating a missing authentication token. No HTML metadata, scripts, or external resources are present. No CMS or frameworks can be detected. The lack of content and metadata suggests the domain is configured as an API endpoint or backend service rather than a public website. No hosting provider or performance data is available. The site is not optimized for mobile or accessibility due to the absence of content. Technical debt or modernization opportunities cannot be assessed without further access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with triggle.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review triggle.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.