Skip to main content

Security report for traq.li

Piano · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Piano is a technology company specializing in digital audience engagement solutions, including automated newsletters and real-time notifications through its Amplifier product. The website presents a professional and modern interface built using the Framer framework and integrates third-party SDKs such as Piano Experience and axept.io for enhanced functionality. The business targets marketers and enterprises seeking to improve audience retention and engagement through automated communication tools. The market position appears solid within the SaaS digital marketing technology sector, although detailed company data such as founding year or parent company is not disclosed on the analyzed page. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized with good SEO practices, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies on the analyzed page, which are important for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection, which is common for technology companies but limits domain age and registrant verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and security best practices. The site is accessible without WAF blocking or challenges, and content is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching traq.li

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Piano operates in the technology sector providing SaaS solutions for digital marketing and audience engagement. Its Amplifier product focuses on newsletters and notifications automation, targeting businesses aiming to boost retention and communication effectiveness. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, leveraging integrations and SDKs to deliver value. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and professional content, although explicit contact and compliance information is limited on the analyzed page. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The lack of WHOIS transparency is typical for privacy-conscious tech firms. The company likely serves medium-sized to large enterprises given the product scope and technical sophistication. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed but the product focus aligns with current digital marketing trends.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options in the provided data, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected on the analyzed page, reducing immediate risk of injection vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies on the page is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, limiting transparency for security issues. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but reduces registrant transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with key areas for improvement in policy visibility, security headers, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident response channels.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update technical infrastructure to maintain strong SSL/TLS configurations and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Piano
Description
Engage your audience with automated newsletters and real-time notifications using Piano Amplifier. Boost retention through targeted communication.
Key services
Automated newsletters, Real-time notifications, Audience engagement, Retention boosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Fonts, axept.io SDK, Piano Experience SDK
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
axept.io
Marketing tools
Piano Experience SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to privacy or query failure
  2. No explicit contact information or policies found on the analyzed page
  3. Website uses modern front-end framework (Framer) and integrates Piano and axept.io SDKs
  4. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  5. Content is business-focused and safe
  6. No visible security headers in provided data; SSL is present but configuration details unknown
  7. No forms detected on the analyzed page
  8. No social media or direct contact emails found in the provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer framework, leveraging modern web fonts from Google Fonts and integrating external SDKs such as Piano Experience and axept.io for functionality and consent management. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Hosting and backend details are not disclosed. Performance appears moderate based on asset loading and framework usage. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is explicitly detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and policy implementations to reduce technical debt and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with traq.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review traq.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.