Skip to main content

Security report for translatex.com

GTranslate Inc · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TranslateX, operated by GTranslate Inc, provides a neural machine translation API service supporting 35 languages with a focus on privacy and performance. The company offers multiple subscription plans tailored to different user needs, ranging from free to enterprise levels, with features such as GPU-accelerated hosting and privacy modes. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, targeting developers and businesses requiring translation services. The domain is well-established since 2006, consistent with the company's founding timeline. Technically, the site uses modern web standards and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to an email address. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate security posture and business credibility but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of translatex.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching translatex.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TranslateX operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider of translation APIs. Its market positioning is niche, focusing on neural translation with privacy features. The business model is subscription-based, with clear pricing tiers and feature sets. The target audience includes developers and businesses needing scalable translation solutions. The company appears small in size but with a stable market presence since 2006. The parent company is GTranslate Inc, which is referenced in the footer and domain relationships. The ecosystem includes related domains for user dashboards and corporate information. No social media or extensive marketing tools are evident, indicating a focused product offering rather than broad consumer marketing.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing a baseline of security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness indicators. The privacy mode for paid plans indicates a commitment to data protection, but the lack of cookie consent and tracking disclosures is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the translatex.com domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and marketing tools with privacy-respecting configurations to enhance business intelligence without compromising user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GTranslate Inc
Description
Translate English to Spanish privately with our neural translation engine. Offers neural machine translation API supporting 35 languages with various subscription plans.
Key services
Neural machine translation API, Translation between 35 languages, Multiple subscription plans with different features
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Fetch API, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No storage of translation content for paid plans with privacy mode

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers a neural translation API service with multiple subscription tiers.
  2. Clear pricing and feature differentiation between plans.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of Cloudflare DNS and potential tracking.
  4. Contact email provided but no phone or physical address found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in HTML content.
  8. Good mobile responsiveness and user interface design.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  10. No security headers visible in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, using modern features like Fetch API for asynchronous translation requests. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and user experience. No CMS or major frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external dependencies or tracking scripts. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and potential risk. The translation API supports multiple languages and offers GPU-accelerated hosting for higher-tier plans, indicating a scalable backend infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with translatex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review translatex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.