Skip to main content

Security report for trakkr.ai

Trakkr · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trakkr is a technology startup offering a SaaS platform that provides real-time monitoring and visibility of brand mentions across major AI language models such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. The platform targets businesses and marketing teams seeking to optimize their AI search presence and gain competitive intelligence. The website is built on the Bubble.io platform, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, and integrates PostHog for analytics tracking. The design and content quality are good, with clear messaging and modern UI elements, although no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present on the main page. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer locked, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security.txt or incident response contacts are published. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity and business credibility, suitable for a small tech startup.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trakkr.ai

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche player in AI brand visibility and monitoring, offering daily prompt tracking, sentiment analysis, and referral analytics. The business model appears to be SaaS with free and paid tiers, targeting marketing professionals and brands interested in AI search optimization. The domain age and registration details align with a new startup founded in 2025, with privacy protection used to safeguard registrant information. The platform's ecosystem includes integrations with major AI models and uses modern web technologies. No direct contact information or formal policies were found, which could impact trust and compliance perceptions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer lock to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The use of PostHog analytics indicates moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with better transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trakkr
Description
Trakkr provides daily monitoring of ChatGPT, Claude & major LLMs with visibility scores and alerts - all for free. It offers real-time intelligence on AI search visibility, brand monitoring, competitor tracking, and actionable insights to optimize AI-driven search presence.
Key services
Real-time AI brand monitoring, Daily prompt tracking, Visibility and sentiment tracking, AI referral analytics, Optimization playbooks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PostHog analytics, Chart.js, Citizendev Bubble Utils, Tippy.js for tooltips, Google Fonts (Inter, Fira Code), Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bubble.io platform
Platforms
Cloudflare (DNS and CDN), PostHog (analytics)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain locked with clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
Promotekit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a SaaS platform focused on AI brand visibility and monitoring
  2. Content is well structured with modern UI elements
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found
  5. Uses Bubble.io platform with Cloudflare DNS and CDN
  6. PostHog analytics used for user tracking
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. Domain is privacy protected with reasonable registration details
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bubble.io no-code platform, which provides rapid development and deployment capabilities. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, ensuring reliable hosting and performance. The tech stack includes PostHog for analytics, Chart.js for data visualization, and Tippy.js for UI tooltips. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site shows good mobile optimization and accessibility basics but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies on CDNs and third-party scripts. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and structured data. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party services and lack of DNSSEC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trakkr.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trakkr.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.