Skip to main content

Security report for todesktop.com

ToDesktop · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ToDesktop is a technology company offering a platform that converts web applications into cross-platform desktop applications with native features. The website is professionally designed, targeting developers and software teams seeking to quickly create desktop apps from existing web codebases. The platform supports Windows, Mac, and Linux and provides both a code-optional drag & drop builder and desktop APIs for customization. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Svelte and Electron, hosted likely behind Cloudflare, and employs Google Analytics for user tracking. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing trustworthiness and raising questions about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching todesktop.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a niche focus on desktop app creation from web apps. Its business model appears to be SaaS-oriented, offering downloadable software and developer tools. The presence of multiple customer logos suggests some market traction and partnerships. The target audience is primarily web developers and software teams. The lack of publicly available company registration or contact information limits the ability to fully assess business credibility. The use of modern web technologies and cross-platform support positions ToDesktop competitively in its niche. However, the missing WHOIS data and absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no obvious exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The missing WHOIS data also raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. The site does not provide contact channels for security incidents, which is a best practice for mature security programs. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, improvements in transparency and security policy publication are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including business address, emails, and phone numbers.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ToDesktop
Description
ToDesktop is a web application that transforms web app codebases into cross-platform desktop applications with native functionality. It offers a code-optional drag & drop builder and desktop APIs for customization, targeting developers who want to quickly create desktop apps from web apps.
Key services
Web app to desktop app conversion, Drag & drop app builder, Desktop APIs for native functionality, Cross-platform support (Windows, Mac, Linux)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Svelte, Electron (mentioned), Google Analytics
Frameworks
Svelte
Platforms
Web, Windows, Mac, Linux
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page or indicated URLs.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Website uses modern JavaScript framework Svelte and Electron for desktop app creation.
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Multiple customer logos displayed indicating some market traction.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Svelte for frontend and Electron for desktop app development. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare CDN, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly. Google Analytics is used for tracking user behavior. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. The code is modular with multiple preloaded fonts and scripts, indicating good technical implementation. However, the absence of some security headers and compliance documents indicates areas for technical and procedural improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with todesktop.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review todesktop.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.