Skip to main content

Security report for tjsokolroven.cz

T.J. SOKOL ROVEŇ · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

T.J. Sokol Roveň is a small local sports and cultural organization based in the Czech Republic, primarily focused on football and other community sports activities. The website serves as an information hub for club members and local residents, providing schedules, results, historical data, and news updates. The site is built on Backdrop CMS and uses common web technologies including jQuery, Featherlight lightbox, and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the site is accessible and well-structured with good content quality, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and publicly available contact information, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to verify domain registration legitimacy, although the website content appears consistent with a legitimate local sports club. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity and security posture but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tjsokolroven.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit community sports club offering multiple sports disciplines and cultural events to local residents. Its business model centers on community engagement and amateur sports participation rather than commercial revenue generation. The website targets local sports enthusiasts, families, and club members. The presence of detailed historical archives, event calendars, and match results indicates active community involvement. Partnerships with local government and sponsors are visible through logos and links. The club's market position is that of a small, community-focused entity with a stable presence in the region. Growth opportunities may include digital modernization and enhanced online engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating basic security awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no data protection officer contact is visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, formal privacy documentation, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate a data protection officer if applicable.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
T.J. SOKOL ROVEŇ
Description
T.J. Sokol Roveň is a local sports and cultural organization based in the Czech Republic, offering activities primarily related to football (soccer), floorball, table tennis, chess, hockeyball, Czech handball, theater, and general physical exercise. The site provides historical information, schedules, results, and news about the club's activities.
Key services
Football teams and matches, Floorball activities, Table tennis, Chess, Cultural events and theater, Physical exercise classes, Youth sports training and competitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Backdrop CMS, jQuery, Featherlight lightbox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Backdrop CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  4. Site uses Backdrop CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics.
  5. Content is focused on local sports club activities and community engagement.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  9. No data protection officer or certifications mentioned.
  10. External links mostly to Google services and local partner sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Backdrop CMS, a modern fork of Drupal, and uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Featherlight for UI enhancements. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure or resource loading. However, the hosting provider is not identified, and no advanced performance optimization techniques are evident. The site would benefit from improved SEO metadata and enhanced security configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small community site but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tjsokolroven.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tjsokolroven.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.