Skip to main content

Security report for tintup.com

TrueLoyal Platform · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TrueLoyal is an AI-powered loyalty and rewards platform designed to help businesses increase repeat purchases, drive customer retention, and convert customers into brand advocates. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of features including gamification, churn prediction, omnichannel loyalty, referral programs, and personalized engagement tools. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with a modern WordPress CMS, Elementor framework, and integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Freshsales CRM. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not clearly published. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, possibly indicating a very new registration or privacy protection. Overall, the site is professional and business-focused, targeting companies seeking advanced loyalty solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tintup.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
90
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TrueLoyal operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting businesses that require AI-driven loyalty and rewards solutions. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering a platform with extensive features for customer engagement and retention. The company positions itself as a trusted provider with advanced AI capabilities and a broad feature set. The website content is well-structured and detailed, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on technology innovation. The lack of explicit contact information and WHOIS data suggests a need for improved transparency. The platform integrates with various marketing and analytics services, supporting a data-driven approach to customer loyalty. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, and no certifications or compliance frameworks are explicitly mentioned.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts loaded asynchronously, which is good for performance and security. However, there is no explicit evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The cookie consent banner indicates some level of privacy compliance, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service is a significant gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by publishing security policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security issues.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Monitor domain registration status and update WHOIS information to enhance legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrueLoyal Platform
Description
The trusted AI-powered loyalty and rewards platform to increase repeat purchase, drive retention, and turn your best customers into brand advocates.
Key services
AI-powered loyalty, Challenges, Churn Prediction, Gamification, Predictive Consumer Insights, Streaks, Incentive Engine/Rewards Catalog, Omnichannel Loyalty, Referral Loyalty, Loyalty App & Microsite
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Freshsales, Vector Analytics, Cloudfront CDN, CookieYes
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Freshsales, Vector Analytics, Leadsy AI
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Freshsales, Vector Analytics, Leadsy AI
Marketing tools
Freshsales CRM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts
  7. Professional design and consistent branding
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No security incident response info available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and various asynchronous JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing. The site uses multiple third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Freshsales CRM, and Vector Analytics, indicating a sophisticated marketing and data collection infrastructure. The hosting appears to utilize AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses cookie consent management via CookieYes, supporting privacy compliance efforts. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular updates and monitoring for vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tintup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tintup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.