Skip to main content

Security report for tilt.computer

TILT · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TILT is a small web design and development studio focused on creating websites and digital products. The company presents a portfolio of creative projects for various clients, emphasizing design-led development. The website is modern and visually appealing, targeting clients seeking bespoke web solutions. The technical infrastructure uses modern JavaScript modules and CSS with SVG graphics, hosted likely via NameCheap services. While the site is mobile optimized and well-structured, it lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is basic with no DNSSEC or security headers detected, and no incident response information is provided. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tilt.computer

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tilt.computer, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tilt.computer right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TILT operates in the technology sector as a service provider specializing in web design and development. The business model is client-service oriented, focusing on launching digital products and websites. Market positioning is niche, targeting creative and design-conscious clients. The company was founded in 2022, consistent with domain registration data. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The company maintains a portfolio of diverse clients, indicating a growing presence. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed. Strategic observations suggest the company should improve transparency and compliance to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The domain uses HTTPS (inferred but not explicitly confirmed), but DNSSEC is not enabled. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no published privacy policy, cookie policy, or incident response plan, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The absence of these policies and headers increases risk exposure. The website does not appear to collect sensitive data via forms, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user trust signals. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Enhance contact information with phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TILT
Description
Design-led web development and technology fellas helping to launch digital products and build websites.
Key services
web design, web development, digital product launch support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript (ES Modules), CSS, SVG
Frameworks
lenis (scroll library)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio and service site for a small web design and development studio named TILT.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address and Instagram link.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Modern JavaScript module and CSS used, with SVG graphics.
  8. Domain is registered with NameCheap without DNSSEC enabled.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including JavaScript ES modules and CSS with SVG graphics for visual elements. The presence of the 'lenis' scroll library indicates attention to smooth user experience. Hosting is inferred to be via NameCheap based on DNS servers. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images implemented. Mobile optimization is good with responsive grid layouts. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. There is no CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site build. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could expose the site to certain attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tilt.computer. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tilt.computer.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.