Skip to main content

Security report for tilde.ai

Tilde.ai · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tilde.ai is a European leader in AI-driven language technologies, offering a comprehensive suite of services including neural machine translation, human translation, website translation, speech-to-text, text-to-speech, real-time transcription, and conversational AI solutions such as chatbots and internal knowledge assistants. The company targets businesses and enterprises seeking advanced language technology solutions to enhance communication and automation. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations, indicating a solid technical infrastructure. Analytics and tracking tools such as Hotjar and Facebook Pixel are used, with a cookie consent mechanism in place, though explicit privacy and terms policies are not directly found on the main page. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers and formal security policies. WHOIS data shows consistent and transparent registration under Digital Privacy Corporation, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tilde.ai

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tilde.ai operates in the technology sector specializing in AI language solutions, positioning itself as a European leader. Its business model is B2B, providing machine and human translation services, speech technologies, and conversational AI products. The company appears medium-sized, founded in 2017, and owned by Digital Privacy Corporation. The website demonstrates a clear product portfolio and targets enterprise customers needing multilingual and speech processing capabilities. The presence of multiple language versions (English, Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian) indicates a regional focus in the Baltics and Europe. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major platforms such as Microsoft Azure (DNS), Facebook, and Google for analytics and marketing. No direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain transfer protection, indicating a baseline secure configuration. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. No explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggests limited formal vulnerability management communication. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional security headers, DNSSEC, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tilde.ai
Description
Tilde is a European leader in AI-driven language technology, offering neural machine translation, chatbots, and speech solutions.
Key services
Machine Translation, Human Translation, Website Translation, Custom Machine Translation, Terminology Management, Document Anonymisation, Speech-to-text, Text-to-speech, Real-time Transcription, AI Chatbots
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, React (implied by meta tags), Facebook SDK, Hotjar, Cookie-script.com, Google Tag Manager, Bot Framework Webchat
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Azure DNS (ns1-06.azure-dns.com etc.)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich for AI language technology services.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or menu.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via cookie-script.com.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page HTML content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics/tracking tools is evident.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business identity.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses a variety of modern web technologies including jQuery, React-based components (Bot Framework Webchat), Facebook SDK, Hotjar for analytics, and Google Tag Manager for marketing. Hosting appears to be on Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as keyboard navigation and ARIA roles, though accessibility is rated basic. SEO is supported by Rank Math plugin with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with multiple external scripts and tracking pixels, which could be optimized. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tilde.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tilde.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.