Skip to main content

Security report for tilda.cc

Tilda Publishing · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tilda Publishing operates a sophisticated no-code website builder platform that enables users to create websites, online stores, landing pages, and blogs with ease. The platform targets a broad audience including entrepreneurs, designers, and educators, offering over 550 customizable blocks and AI-powered features to streamline website creation. The company maintains a strong market position with a comprehensive suite of services and integrations, supported by a professional and consistent brand presence. Technically, the website leverages a proprietary CMS and JavaScript libraries including jQuery, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. While the site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, performance metrics are not explicitly available. The platform integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is currently basic, with minimal security headers and a non-functional SSL certificate, which is a critical issue. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear incident response contact channels. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content accessibility. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent improvements in SSL configuration and security headers to enhance user trust and security compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tilda.cc. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tilda.cc

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tilda Publishing's business model centers on providing a SaaS platform for no-code website creation, targeting individuals and businesses seeking easy-to-use digital presence tools. Their competitive advantage lies in design quality, extensive block libraries, and AI-powered content generation. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans, premium features, and additional services such as CRM and email marketing. The company fosters a strong partnership ecosystem with integrations to major marketing and payment platforms. Growth indicators include a rich content library, educational resources, and active social media engagement, positioning Tilda as a leader in the no-code website builder market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a critical vulnerability that undermines user trust and data protection. Security headers are limited to X-Frame-Options, with no HSTS, CSP, or other modern protections. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response is facilitated via an abuse contact page. Compliance with GDPR is supported by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. The security culture appears to prioritize usability over advanced security measures, indicating room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting modern protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) to secure all site traffic.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including HSTS with preload, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by publishing a detailed security policy and data protection officer contact information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda proprietary CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript and jQuery libraries, and served via a global CDN hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site is well-structured with modern design and mobile responsiveness. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and minimal security headers represent significant technical debt. Performance data is unavailable, but the use of CDN and optimized images suggests moderate to good loading speeds. Accessibility features are basic, with potential for enhancement to meet wider standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tilda.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tilda.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.