Skip to main content

Security report for tikstar.com

TIKSTAR · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tikstar is a specialized SaaS platform offering TikTok analytics tools focused on influencers, shops, products, videos, hashtags, and music to help brands, sellers, and creators optimize their TikTok strategies. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting TikTok influencers and e-commerce sellers. Technically, it uses modern analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Plausible Analytics, and is mobile optimized with moderate performance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism. Business credibility is moderate with clear contact email and user testimonials but no phone or physical address. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust and raises legitimacy concerns. Overall, Tikstar presents a functional and professional platform with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tikstar.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tikstar operates in the e-commerce sector providing TikTok analytics services that enable users to discover influencers, viral videos, top shops, and trending products. Its business model is subscription-based with free trials and tiered plans. The platform leverages partnerships with related tools like pipiads.com and toolify.ai to enhance its offerings. Target customers include TikTok influencers, shop sellers, and brand advertisers seeking data-driven insights. The company emphasizes ease of use with filtering options and exporting influencer contact info, positioning itself as a niche leader in TikTok analytics. Growth indicators include active user testimonials and multiple specialized libraries. However, lack of public WHOIS data and limited contact info may impact trust among enterprise clients.

Security posture

Tikstar demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. The site uses modern tracking and analytics scripts responsibly. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent banner. The absence of WHOIS registrant data is a concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small SaaS platform but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards and build greater user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TIKSTAR
Description
Tikstar provides a free TikTok analytics tool to analyze TikTok shops, products, videos, influencers, hashtags, and music to improve TikTok strategy.
Key services
Influencer Library, Video Library, Shop Library, Product Library, Hashtag Library, Music Library, Ranking and analytics for TikTok shops and products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Swiper.js, Plausible Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok Ads (via getstartedtiktok.pxf.io)
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Website offers specialized TikTok analytics tools targeting influencers and e-commerce sellers.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email contact present.
  5. Privacy and terms pages exist but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. Uses modern analytics and tracking tools including Microsoft Clarity and Plausible.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
  9. Website design and UX are professional and mobile optimized.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Swiper.js for UI components, and Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused tracking. The HTML and CSS are valid and the site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with some large images but overall responsive design. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and marketing but no suspicious or malicious scripts are found. Technical debt appears low with opportunities to improve security headers and privacy compliance. The infrastructure supports a SaaS business model focused on TikTok data analytics.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tikstar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tikstar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.