Skip to main content

Security report for tidio.co

Tidio · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tidio is a technology company specializing in AI-driven customer service chatbots and live chat software designed to help businesses convert leads, provide support, and increase revenue. The company offers a SaaS platform with multiple subscription tiers and integrates AI automation to streamline customer interactions. Their market position is strong, supported by high user ratings and a broad presence on review and social media platforms. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and employs advanced analytics and consent management tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses modern security headers, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response contact. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, but the absence of WHOIS data slightly impacts domain trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tidio.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tidio.co

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tidio.co, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
405
Employees
0
Customers
405
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
28%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tidio.co.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tidio operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses seeking AI-enhanced customer support solutions. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with tiered pricing plans. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major platforms like Shopify and WordPress, enhancing market reach. Their competitive advantage lies in combining AI automation with live chat and help desk functionalities. The company demonstrates growth potential through continuous product innovation and a strong digital presence. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests either privacy protection or registry issues, which should be monitored for trust implications.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. To improve, Tidio should consider publishing a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but can be strengthened with clearer communication and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Maintain transparency on data retention and privacy practices to reinforce GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS and domain registration data to ensure consistency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tidio
Description
Convert more leads, provide stellar support, and boost your revenue with Tidio’s game-changing AI-driven customer service solution.
Key services
AI customer service chatbot (Lyro), Live chat software, Help desk software, Chatbot automation (Flows), Ticketing system
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (Next.js framework), Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web-based
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Google AdSense, Microsoft Clarity, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Amplitude
Marketing tools
ProfitWell
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and modern design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or registry anomaly.
  3. Strong presence on multiple review and social platforms.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism implemented.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack centered on React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and good SEO. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, and Cookiebot indicates advanced analytics and privacy management. Hosting appears to be on a proprietary or cloud CDN infrastructure optimized for speed and availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to enhance security transparency and incident readiness through additional documentation and contact channels.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium13 findings · partial scanView report
  3. 66/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tidio.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tidio.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.