Skip to main content

Security report for thinkingboxenterprise.com

Thinkingbox Enterprise · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thinkingbox Enterprise is a technology consulting partner specializing in digital transformation for large enterprises and global organizations. They provide a broad range of digital services including web and mobile app design and development, digital marketing, and custom software solutions. Their client portfolio includes major brands such as Adobe, Starbucks, Riot Games, and Pfizer, positioning them as a trusted partner in the technology sector. The company operates from offices in Salt Lake City and Vancouver, targeting enterprise-level clients with complex digital needs. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies and integrates with multiple CMS platforms such as Adobe EDS, Prismic, and Sanity, hosted on AWS infrastructure. However, some technical aspects like DNSSEC and security headers are missing, indicating room for improvement in security posture. The security evaluation shows a generally good baseline with HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data raises concerns due to a future domain creation date, which is inconsistent with the website's apparent maturity and client history, slightly reducing trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and compliance disclosures to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thinkingboxenterprise.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as an important entity in the technology sector, focusing on enterprise digital transformation. Their business model revolves around consulting and delivering tailored digital solutions to large-scale clients. The presence of high-profile clients and testimonials indicates strong market positioning and competitive advantage. The partnership ecosystem includes major CMS providers and cloud hosting services, enhancing their service delivery capabilities. The lack of publicly available contact information and privacy policies may limit direct customer engagement and compliance transparency. Growth indicators are implied by the diverse client portfolio and multi-platform technical expertise. Strategic observations suggest the company is well-established in digital transformation but should improve transparency and compliance to sustain growth and trust.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers or policies found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS inconsistency regarding domain creation date is a concern for legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is basic to moderate, with recommendations to implement DNSSEC, security headers, and formal security policies to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear contact information including incident response and data protection officer contacts to improve transparency and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Thinkingbox Enterprise
Description
Thinkingbox Enterprise is a design-forward technology solution partner, serving world-renowned brands. They offer impactful digital solutions ranging from web design and development to mobile app design and development to digital marketing. Offices are based in Salt Lake City and Vancouver.
Key services
Web Design, Web Development, Mobile App Design and Development, Digital Marketing, Digital Transformation, Custom Software Development, Content Management Systems, AI/Machine Learning, Cloud Architecture, Systems Integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript (module scripts), CSS, HTML5, Prismic CMS, Sanity CMS, Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical and og:url
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided on the homepage or visible content.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  4. Strong branding with consistent client logos and testimonials.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript modules and CSS indicates up-to-date front-end technology.
  6. Multiple CMS platforms referenced as partners, indicating flexible content management capabilities.
  7. No explicit security headers or incident response information found.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML content.
  9. No advertising or marketing tracking detected.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including JavaScript modules and CSS with responsive design elements. It integrates with multiple CMS platforms (Adobe EDS, Prismic, Sanity) and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a robust and scalable technical foundation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, although canonical URLs point to a different domain, which may be a misconfiguration. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The domain registrar is Amazon Registrar, Inc., but the domain creation date is set in the future, which is unusual and may indicate an error or placeholder data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and clearer domain registration data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thinkingboxenterprise.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thinkingboxenterprise.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.