Skip to main content

Security report for theprocessautomator.com

The Process Automator · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Process Automator is a small technology consulting business specializing in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and low-code/no-code automation solutions. The company leverages over twelve years of experience to help businesses increase cashflow by automating repetitive tasks. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of services and client success stories, targeting companies seeking automation expertise. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow CMS platform, uses modern web technologies including jQuery and CSS3, and is hosted on Amazon CloudFront, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but no active consent mechanism. Business credibility is supported by social media presence and client project references, though direct contact emails and phone numbers are not provided. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-constructed but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theprocessautomator.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche market of RPA and process automation consulting, offering custom automation solutions primarily through low-code and no-code platforms. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on increasing client cashflow and operational efficiency. The presence of case studies and social media links to Forbes and TED Talk profiles indicates a credible market position. The target audience includes small to medium businesses looking to automate internal processes. The company appears independent with no parent or subsidiary affiliations. Marketing and advertising practices are minimal, relying on organic reach and social proof. The company uses modern web infrastructure and maintains a consistent brand image.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms for data collection, which is positive. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The privacy policy exists but does not indicate full GDPR compliance or active cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional policies and headers to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide direct company contact information such as verified emails or phone numbers to improve trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Process Automator
Description
Helps companies increase cashflow by leveraging Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to automate tedious, repetitive tasks and processes through Low- and No-Code systems. Over twelve years of experience.
Key services
Robotic Process Automation, Low-code/No-code automation solutions, Custom process automation systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, CSS3, JavaScript
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with required email input

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is focused on RPA and automation consulting services
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form and social media
  4. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack explicit consent mechanisms
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Modern Webflow CMS based site with good design and performance
  7. Social media presence on multiple platforms including Forbes and TED Talk links
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern front-end technologies including CSS3 and JavaScript with jQuery. Hosting is provided via Amazon CloudFront CDN, contributing to fast load times and good performance. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theprocessautomator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theprocessautomator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.