Skip to main content

Security report for thegeomob.com

OpenCage GmbH · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geomob is a specialized event series and podcast platform targeting geospatial enthusiasts and location-based service creators primarily in Europe. The website serves as a community hub offering event information, podcast episodes, and sponsorship details. The business operates under OpenCage GmbH, a known entity in the geospatial data sector, enhancing its credibility. The platform's market position is niche but well-defined, focusing on geoinnovation discussions and networking. Technically, the website employs modern web standards with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, hosted and registered via Cloudflare, ensuring reliable DNS and domain management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The site uses minimal tracking via Fathom Analytics and Mailchimp for mailing list management, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach but lacking explicit user consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich for its target audience but would benefit from improved security headers, explicit privacy and cookie policies, and DNSSEC implementation to strengthen its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thegeomob.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thegeomob.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thegeomob.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geomob operates as a small-sized technology business focused on geospatial innovation through events and podcasts. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche community focus and partnerships with reputable geospatial organizations like OpenCage and OGC. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships and possibly event-related income. The target customers are geogeeks, developers, and enthusiasts interested in location-based services. Growth indicators include a steady event schedule and active podcast production. The partnership ecosystem is strong with known geospatial data and standards organizations, enhancing market credibility. The business model is content and community-driven, leveraging digital channels for engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are active, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Data protection practices are minimal, with no visible GDPR compliance statements or cookie consent mechanisms. The use of minimal tracking tools like Fathom Analytics is positive for privacy. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update security posture including vulnerability assessments and penetration testing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OpenCage GmbH
Description
Geomob is an event series and podcast for location based service creators and enthusiasts, providing a forum to discuss geoinnovation in all forms.
Key services
Event organization, Podcast production, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and Cloudflare usage)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche community platform for geospatial enthusiasts.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the site.
  3. Contact is primarily via subscription form; no direct emails or phone numbers listed.
  4. Use of modern web standards and Cloudflare DNS/registrar.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. Sponsorship by reputable geospatial organizations adds trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript) and hosted via Cloudflare infrastructure, ensuring reliable DNS and domain management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata. No CMS or major frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight build. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The use of Fathom Analytics and Mailchimp indicates modern, privacy-conscious marketing and analytics tools. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thegeomob.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thegeomob.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.