Skip to main content

Security report for tetrate.io

Tetrate · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tetrate is an enterprise technology company specializing in AI infrastructure and governance solutions, leveraging the Envoy proxy and Envoy AI Gateway. Their offerings focus on trusted connectivity, AI risk and cost governance, and platform services for enterprises. The company targets IT, FinOps, CISOs, and developers, positioning itself as a leader in AI operations and governance. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with a modern tech stack, fast performance, and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, though improvements are needed in explicit security policies and headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, supporting Tetrate's market position as a key player in AI enterprise solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tetrate.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tetrate.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8
Employees
0
Customers
8
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tetrate.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tetrate operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI infrastructure and governance. Their business model revolves around enterprise software solutions that empower organizations to manage AI risk, cost, and compliance effectively. The company benefits from partnerships with Envoy proxy projects and serves a global enterprise audience. Their market positioning is strengthened by trusted customer logos and a clear value proposition around AI safety and profitability. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, managed services, and consulting. The company shows growth indicators through active blog content and product innovation. The partnership ecosystem includes Envoy and related AI gateway projects, enhancing their competitive advantage.

Security posture

Tetrate's security maturity is moderate to good. The website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and domain registration protections like clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program visible. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact channels including security@ or abuse@ emails.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tetrate
Description
Tetrate provides trusted connectivity and control for AI. Empower developers while safeguarding the business. Built atop the proven Envoy proxy & Envoy AI Gateway.
Key services
Tetrate Agent Operations Director, Tetrate Agent Router Service, AI Risk Governance, AI Cost Governance, Platform Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Envoy Proxy, Envoy AI Gateway
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Google Cloud DNS (googledomains.com nameservers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited domain statuses

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main pages.
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Strong branding and trust signals from known enterprise customers.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and policies.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for tracking. It is hosted on a platform using Google Cloud DNS with Google nameservers. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with preloading of images and fonts. The tech stack includes Envoy proxy and Envoy AI Gateway technologies, indicating a strong infrastructure focus. The site has clean navigation, structured mega menus, and rich content including blogs and documentation links. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by enabling DNSSEC and improving security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable enterprise web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tetrate.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tetrate.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.