Skip to main content

Security report for team-aretas.com

Team Aretas · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team Aretas operates a niche platform dedicated to competitive fitness, providing users the ability to browse and create fitness competitions. The platform targets fitness athletes and event organizers, positioning itself as a specialized service in the competitive fitness event management space. The website content is well-structured and professionally presented, with testimonials supporting trustworthiness. However, the site lacks visible contact emails or phone numbers, relying likely on a contact form for communication. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript and CSS technologies, with integration of analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Oribi. The presence of a CSRF token indicates some security awareness, but the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site is fully accessible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching team-aretas.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Team Aretas appears to be a small-sized business focused on the competitive fitness sector, offering a platform-based business model centered on event management and leaderboard services. The company leverages partnerships or presence on social media platforms like LinkedIn and Instagram to engage its audience. The lack of visible certifications or detailed business registration information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS data is typical for small businesses and startups, and no suspicious patterns were identified. The business model likely generates revenue through subscription or service fees related to competition creation and management.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with the inclusion of a CSRF token but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL/TLS configuration details, which is a significant gap. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and explicit privacy compliance features indicates potential GDPR compliance risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to enhance SSL configuration, implement security headers, and establish clear privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team Aretas
Description
Team Aretas is a platform focused on competitive fitness, offering services to browse and create fitness competitions. It targets fitness enthusiasts and organizers in the competitive fitness space.
Key services
Browse competitions, Create competitions, Leaderboard and event management software
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, Google Analytics, Oribi Analytics, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in meta tag

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Oribi
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Oribi
Marketing tools
Oribi
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite presence of privacy policy page.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage; contact likely via contact page form.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; CSRF token present indicating some security awareness.
  5. Use of modern analytics tools (Google Analytics, Oribi) but no clear cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram confirmed via footer links.
  7. No visible certifications or security policies published on site.
  8. Site content is focused on competitive fitness event management platform.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in provided HTML.
  10. No forms visible in provided HTML except login link and contact page link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript and CSS, including external libraries such as Font Awesome for icons and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Oribi. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and charset, supporting responsive design. However, mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The lack of structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) limits SEO potential. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with team-aretas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review team-aretas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.