Skip to main content

Security report for surevive.ch

sureVIVE SA · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

sureVIVE SA is a Swiss technology company specializing in software solutions tailored for emergency responders. Their website presents a professional image focused on mission-critical applications for rescue operations, targeting emergency services and rescue organizations. The company positions itself as a niche provider with expertise in both rescue operations and software development, serving a specialized market segment. The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrated with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. While the site is well-designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and some JavaScript-based protections, but additional security headers and policies could enhance the security posture. Overall, the website reflects a credible and legitimate business with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of surevive.ch. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching surevive.ch

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on software for emergency and rescue services. Their business model revolves around developing specialized software products for mission-critical environments, likely generating revenue through software licensing or service contracts with emergency organizations. The target audience includes first responders, emergency medical services, and mountaineering rescue teams. The website's content and structured data confirm a Swiss base of operations in Mendrisio, TI. The absence of visible certifications or partnerships suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with a focused market niche. The use of Wix indicates a preference for managed web hosting and ease of content management. The company demonstrates moderate digital maturity with integrated analytics and consent management but lacks comprehensive compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs JavaScript-based security enhancements to protect cookies and prevent certain attacks. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security researchers and users. The absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service reduces compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with foundational protections in place but missing several key elements for a robust security framework.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and disclose terms of service and incident response procedures to enhance transparency.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to engage with security researchers.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve website quality.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
sureVIVE SA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
sureVIVE SA
Description
sureVIVE SA is a Swiss company that develops software solutions for emergency responders, combining expertise in rescue operations and mission-critical application development.
Key services
software solutions for emergency responders, mission-critical application development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Sentry, JavaScript ES5 polyfills
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie handling with access token protection
  • Security overrides for globals to prevent certain attacks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-17044262759)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Wix platform.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found despite cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Contact information is present but no contact forms detected in provided content.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager with consent management integration.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. No certifications or security frameworks explicitly mentioned.
  7. Content is focused on software for emergency responders, indicating a niche technology business.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt framework, with modern JavaScript polyfills and integrations for analytics and error monitoring (Sentry). Performance is moderate, with mobile optimization and basic accessibility features present. SEO is basic but includes canonical tags and Open Graph metadata. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Ads for marketing and tracking, with consent management scripts to handle GDPR-related consent. Hosting is managed by Wix, providing reliable infrastructure but limiting direct control over server-level security headers. The technical stack is appropriate for a small to medium business but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with surevive.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review surevive.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.