Skip to main content

Security report for supro-nivelo.com

Supro Nivelo s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Supro Nivelo s.r.o. is a small Czech technology company specializing in the architecture of internet services, application development, and online TV solutions. The website presents a professional but basic digital presence with clear contact information and branding consistent with a small service provider. The technical infrastructure leverages modern frontend technology (Svelte) and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. However, the website lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicating a low maturity in security and compliance practices. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content is accessible and business-focused. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical implementation but requires significant improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supro-nivelo.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention supro-nivelo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for supro-nivelo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, targeting clients needing internet service architecture, applications, and online TV solutions. The business model appears service-oriented with a focus on digital solutions. Market positioning is unclear due to limited public information. The website lacks visible partnerships or certifications, which could strengthen credibility. The presence of a VAT and registration number indicates formal business registration in the Czech Republic. Growth indicators and parent or subsidiary relationships are not evident. The company could benefit from expanding its digital footprint and improving transparency to attract more clients and partners.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak, with no detected security headers and no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details. The website does not provide privacy or cookie policies, nor does it offer incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but privacy compliance is minimal. The lack of WHOIS data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not documented. The company should prioritize implementing standard security headers, enforce HTTPS, publish privacy and cookie policies, and establish a vulnerability disclosure process to improve security maturity and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  3. Deploy standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Supro Nivelo s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ29020239
Registration number
29020239
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Supro Nivelo s.r.o.
Description
Jsme architekti internetových služeb, aplikací a online TV.
Key services
internet services architecture, application development, online TV solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Svelte, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Svelte
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is present but limited to email and physical address; no phone number found.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technology (Svelte) and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected; security posture is weak.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  8. Content is safe and business-focused with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Svelte framework for frontend development, indicating a modern and lightweight technology stack. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and user tracking respectively. The site loads multiple JavaScript modules asynchronously, which supports performance optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility and SEO features. The absence of security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by adding security best practices, improving SEO, and expanding accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supro-nivelo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supro-nivelo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.