Skip to main content

Security report for supernews.com

Supernews Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Supernews Inc. operates a Usenet newsgroups service website offering unlimited access, speed, and SSL encrypted connections with extensive retention of newsgroup content. The company positions itself as a reliable and affordable Usenet provider with over 20 years of experience, targeting users seeking simple and effective Usenet access. The website is professionally designed with good content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Bing UET, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with SSL encryption and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some HTTP security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website branding and content suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain adult or explicit content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supernews.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention supernews.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,205
Employees
2
Customers
2,201
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2025-08-20 · 8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for supernews.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –supernews.com2025-08-20
  • –www.supernews.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Supernews holds a medium-sized position in the technology sector as a Usenet service provider with a subscription-based business model. Its competitive advantages include extensive retention periods, unlimited speed and access, and 24/7 customer support. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors like GoCardless and maintains active social media channels. The website's marketing ecosystem includes multiple tracking and retargeting services, supporting customer acquisition and engagement. Growth indicators include free trial offers and customer testimonials. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and limited direct contact information may impact trust and customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with SSL encryption enforced for all connections and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for compliance and customer trust. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The security culture appears basic but could be improved with formal policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner and privacy controls to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide incident response contact information to demonstrate security commitment.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and transparency.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Supernews Inc.
Description
Supernews provides Usenet service offering unlimited speed and access, SSL encryption, and extensive retention of newsgroup content. They emphasize simplicity, reliability, and affordable pricing with 24/7 support.
Key services
Unlimited Usenet access, Unlimited speed, SSL encrypted connections, Extensive text and binary retention, 24/7 customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing UET, Google Tag Manager, WebFont Loader
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • SSL encryption for all connections
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by cookie.js usage)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Silverpop
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to Usenet services
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising legitimacy questions
  5. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts present
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter confirmed
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Bing UET for tracking and analytics. It loads Google Fonts asynchronously and employs responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy mechanisms are recommended to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supernews.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supernews.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.