Skip to main content

Security report for sundialproperties.co.uk

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

70/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.sundialproperties.co.uk is currently non-functional, displaying a database connection error page with no accessible content or metadata. The domain WHOIS lookup failed with an error indicating the domain name is invalid or non-registered, which raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and operational status of the website. No business information, contact details, or privacy and security policies are present, indicating a lack of digital maturity and compliance readiness. From a technical perspective, the site lacks HTTPS and essential security headers, and no modern technologies or CMS platforms are detectable. The absence of content and metadata prevents any meaningful SEO or user experience evaluation. The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security best practices, and the site is vulnerable to trust and credibility issues. Overall, the risk assessment is high due to the website's inaccessibility, invalid domain registration, and lack of security and compliance measures. Strategic recommendations include restoring backend functionality, securing a valid domain registration, implementing HTTPS and security headers, and establishing comprehensive privacy and contact policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sundialproperties.co.uk

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and metadata, no definitive business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears invalid per WHOIS data, suggesting the business may not be operational online or the domain is misconfigured. No market positioning, competitive advantages, or partnership information is available. The absence of contact or company information further limits business insights.

Security posture

The security posture is poor, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. The site is currently down due to a database error, which may expose operational risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Immediate remediation is required to restore secure and compliant operations.

Recommendations

  1. Restore database connectivity to enable website functionality and content availability.
  2. Secure a valid domain registration and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and complete.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data in transit.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Develop and publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with legal requirements and build user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently non-functional showing a database connection error page.
  2. No meaningful content, metadata, or business information is present.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable and indicates domain registration issues.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No contact information or social media links detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS detected in provided data.
  7. No external links or scripts found in the HTML content.
  8. Website is not protected by a WAF or security challenge but is inaccessible due to backend failure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a static error page indicating a database connection failure, with no detectable CMS, frameworks, or external scripts. The HTML is minimal and lacks meta tags, structured data, or SEO elements. No mobile optimization or accessibility features are present. The hosting provider and platform cannot be determined from the provided data. The technical debt is high due to the non-functional state and lack of modern web practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sundialproperties.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sundialproperties.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.