Skip to main content

Security report for sucuri.net

Sucuri · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sucuri is a well-established enterprise-level website security company founded in 2009, offering a comprehensive cloud-based platform that includes malware cleanup, firewall protection, website monitoring, backups, and performance optimization. Their market position is strong, targeting small businesses, web professionals, agencies, and enterprises with tiered subscription plans and custom enterprise solutions. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity, leveraging WordPress with Elementor, Yoast SEO, and modern analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, use of cloud-based WAF, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security.txt or incident response contact emails were found, which could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sucuri.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sucuri.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sucuri operates a subscription SaaS business model with clear tiered plans and custom offerings for agencies and enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in fast malware removal, comprehensive monitoring, and a cloud-based firewall. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with multiple related domains for support, documentation, and scanning services. Their target customers range from individual site owners to large enterprises, indicating a broad market reach. The presence of a 30-day guarantee and 24/7 security team enhances customer trust. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and conversion.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses a cloud-based WAF to protect against attacks. Security best practices such as secure login portals and no exposed sensitive data are observed. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability disclosure. Incident response contact channels are not explicitly provided, which could hinder rapid communication during security events. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and DNS security improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce potential attack surface.
  5. Implement and publicly document security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options if not already done.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sucuri
Description
Sucuri provides a cloud-based website security and protection platform offering malware cleanup, site monitoring, firewall, backups, and performance optimization for websites across various platforms and CMS.
Key services
Website Security Platform, Website Firewall (WAF), Malware Detection and Removal, Performance Boost via CDN, Website Backups, Incident Response
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of cloud-based WAF
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login portals
  • Use of security analytics and monitoring scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Crisp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong focus on website security services with clear product offerings.
  4. Multiple trust signals including customer satisfaction stats and guarantees.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML.
  7. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found in HTML snippet but known to exist on site.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It uses jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components and integrates analytics via Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. Hosting is likely through GoDaddy or a related provider, consistent with the registrar information. Performance is optimized with CDN usage and responsive design, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile experience. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The technical stack is mature with no visible technical debt or deprecated libraries.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low27 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium12 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sucuri.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sucuri.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.