Skip to main content

Security report for sucuri.net

Sucuri · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sucuri is a well-established website security company founded in 2009, offering a cloud-based platform that provides malware cleanup, monitoring, firewall protection, backups, and performance optimization for websites across various CMS platforms. The company targets small businesses, web professionals, and enterprise organizations, positioning itself as a reliable and comprehensive security solution provider. The website demonstrates strong branding, professional design, and clear navigation, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO Premium, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and performs well, with fast loading times and good accessibility features. However, some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers are not fully implemented. From a security posture perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong domain registration protections but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies such as privacy, cookie, and incident response policies. No WAF blocking or content restrictions were detected, indicating full accessibility. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy with consistent registration details and no privacy protection, supporting trustworthiness. Overall, Sucuri's website is professional, secure, and credible, though improvements in privacy compliance and security policy transparency are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sucuri.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sucuri operates in the technology sector, specializing in website security services delivered via a SaaS model. Its market positioning is strong, with a broad service portfolio catering to diverse customer segments including SMBs and enterprises. The company leverages partnerships, such as with TSOHost, to expand its reach. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans with tiered pricing and custom enterprise offerings. The website content and structure indicate a focus on customer education and support, with resources like guides, webinars, and email courses. The presence of a 30-day guarantee and 24/7 security team highlights competitive advantages and customer-centric policies. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and invests in digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and conversion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and domain registration locks that prevent unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of published incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and may impact compliance with GDPR and NIS2 requirements. The use of third-party analytics and chat services introduces moderate user tracking, but no excessive or suspicious tracking was observed. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing comprehensive security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact information, including security and abuse email addresses, to facilitate communication during security events.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sucuri
Description
Sucuri offers fast malware cleanup, reliable monitoring, and powerful protection for any CMS. It is a cloud-based website security platform with experienced security analysts.
Key services
Website Security Platform, Website Firewall (WAF), Malware Detection & Scanning, Incident Response & Malware Removal, Website Performance Boost, Website Backups
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientRenewProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Crisp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in the provided content.
  3. Contact information is present but no explicit emails or physical addresses found.
  4. Strong branding and professional design with consistent use of company logos and colors.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Security best practices partially implemented; DNSSEC missing.
  7. Multiple external trusted domains used for CDN, analytics, and chat support.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No visible forms collecting sensitive data in the provided content.
  10. Live chat and support ticket submission links available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization. It employs jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements and integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site uses Crisp Chat for live support, enhancing customer engagement. Performance is optimized with CDN usage (jsdelivr.net) and responsive design techniques. The technical implementation is robust, with valid HTML and CSS, good accessibility, and mobile optimization. However, there is room for improvement in security configurations and privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low25 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium12 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sucuri.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sucuri.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.