Skip to main content

Security report for styriaweb.at

Styriaweb · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Styriaweb is a small Austrian technology company specializing in comprehensive IT services including homepage creation, software development, design, CMS, e-commerce solutions, IT support, and managed hosting. The company targets a broad audience in the Oststeiermark region, offering an all-in-one digital service portfolio. Their market position is that of a regional IT service provider with a focus on integrated solutions for businesses. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Scriptaculous, and uses Google Analytics for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented, but security headers are missing and some older libraries may pose risks. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with clear privacy and cookie policies. Business credibility is strong with clear contact information and professional content. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced security measures and modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching styriaweb.at

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Styriaweb operates as an essential technology service provider focusing on IT, software, and web solutions. Their business model revolves around providing integrated digital services including CMS, e-commerce, POS systems, and IT infrastructure management. The company serves a regional market in Austria, primarily targeting businesses needing digital transformation and IT support. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a broad service range from design to hosting under one roof. The presence of social media links and a structured website indicates a moderate digital maturity. No evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries was found. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts, software sales, and hosting fees. Growth indicators include active job postings and regular content updates.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent with IP anonymization in Google Analytics is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of older JavaScript libraries like Scriptaculous could introduce vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No explicit incident response or security policy information is published, which may hinder rapid response to security events. GDPR compliance is indicated but could be enhanced with clearer data retention policies and a designated data protection officer. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Audit and update JavaScript libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and appointing a data protection officer.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to broaden user reach and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Styriaweb
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Styriaweb
Description
Styriaweb versteht sich als All-In-One Anbieter. Homepage-Erstellung, Software, Design, CMS, Online Shop, EDV Dienstleistungen, IT Betreuung, Kassensystem, Webapplikationen, Mobile Anwendungen, IT Service, Virtualisierung, Managed Hosting, Newslettersystem uvm.
Key services
Homepage-Erstellung, Softwareentwicklung, Design, Content Management System, Online Shop & E-Commerce, EDV Dienstleistungen, IT Betreuung, Kassensystem (POS), Webapplikationen, Mobile Anwendungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET, JavaScript, jQuery, Scriptaculous, Google Analytics
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Platforms
Windows hosting (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in German targeting Austrian market, specifically Oststeiermark region.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings in IT, software, web design, and hosting.
  4. Presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  5. Use of older JavaScript libraries may require security review.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  8. Social media presence on Xing and Facebook.
  9. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an ASP.NET WebForms platform with JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Scriptaculous. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with IP anonymization enabled. The site uses a custom or proprietary CMS branded as Styriaweb CMS. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The technology stack is somewhat dated, particularly with the use of Scriptaculous, which may pose security and maintenance challenges. No hosting provider details are explicitly identified. SEO is basic but present with meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses a cookie consent banner, indicating some compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with styriaweb.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review styriaweb.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.