Skip to main content

Security report for studioatria.com.br

Atria Design & Inovação · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atria Design & Inovação is a Brazilian small design studio specializing in innovation, branding, and digital experience services. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance their brand and user experience through strategic design solutions. Their website showcases multiple client case studies and a clear service offering, positioning them as an innovative design partner in their market segment. Technically, the website uses modern frontend libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, hosted on Locaweb, but suffers from slow load times and lacks a CMS or structured data for SEO enhancement. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, no HTTPS support, and missing security headers, exposing the site to significant risks. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent popup and a privacy policy page, but no GDPR-specific indicators or terms of service are present. Overall, the site is professional in design and content but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studioatria.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the design and innovation sector, focusing on service design, branding, and digital experience. Their business model revolves around client projects, including startups, wineries, healthcare, and technology sectors. The presence of multiple client logos and detailed case studies indicates a solid portfolio and market presence. The company leverages social media channels like Instagram and LinkedIn for marketing and engagement. However, the lack of advanced analytics and marketing tools suggests a modest digital marketing maturity. The company appears to be a small-sized entity based in Brazil with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content and branding are consistent and targeted toward professional clients seeking design innovation.

Security posture

The website's security posture is poor, primarily due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are implemented, increasing exposure to common web attacks. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces TLS performance and security. No documented security policies or incident response contacts are found, indicating low security maturity. The cookie consent mechanism is present but basic, with no advanced privacy compliance features. These issues pose risks to user data confidentiality and integrity, potentially impacting business reputation and compliance with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Develop and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding cookie consent mechanisms and adding GDPR-specific disclosures.
  6. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and improving load times.
  7. Integrate structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags to improve SEO and social sharing.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Owl Carousel, AOS for scroll animations, and Simple Parallax JS for visual effects. Hosting is provided by Locaweb with DNS managed by their nameservers. The site lacks a CMS and structured data, limiting SEO effectiveness. Performance is suboptimal with a load time of over 5 seconds and a large page size (~168 KB). Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present beyond standard libraries, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a major technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a visually rich experience but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studioatria.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studioatria.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.