Skip to main content

Security report for studio82.cz

Studio82 - Petr Stefan · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio82 is a small Czech-based web design and graphic services studio led by Petr Stefan. The company specializes in custom web presentations, corporate websites, SEO, business cards, posters, and 3D graphics. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Divi theme, reflecting a modern and clean digital presence. The business targets clients seeking tailored web and graphic design solutions, positioning itself as a local expert in the technology sector. Technically, the site uses standard modern web technologies including Google Fonts and Google Analytics, with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, posing a moderate risk. Overall, the site is professional, accessible, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studio82.cz

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention studio82.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for studio82.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio82 operates as a service provider in the technology sector focusing on web and graphic design. Its business model revolves around delivering customized digital and print design services to businesses and individuals. The company leverages WordPress and Divi for rapid deployment and customization. Market positioning is that of a small, specialized studio with a local Czech Republic focus. The website content and structured data indicate a clear brand identity and consistent messaging. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information suggests a small or sole proprietorship entity. The use of GDPR-compliant tools and cookie consent reflects awareness of regulatory requirements. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business appears to maintain a moderate digital maturity level with room for enhanced security and transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. It employs a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR, indicating attention to privacy. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the analysis. The site lacks a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts, which are best practices for vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. The use of standard WordPress plugins and themes requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional headers, security policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce risk of exploitation.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider publishing explicit business registration and contact information to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio82 - Petr Stefan
Description
Studio82 - webové prezentace na míru, firemní weby, SEO, vizitky, plakáty, 3D grafika
Key services
web design, web development, SEO, graphic design, 3D graphics, business cards, posters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi theme, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact form is available.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and standard plugins.
  6. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to web design and graphic services.
  10. No suspicious or malicious external domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible framework for web design. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site includes a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via the Complianz plugin. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations but no explicit advanced caching or CDN detected in the provided data. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements evident. Accessibility is basic, with potential for improvement. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. No hosting provider details were identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studio82.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studio82.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.