Skip to main content

Security report for streamwork.com

StreamWork · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StreamWork is a SaaS company providing online proofing software tailored for creative teams to simplify reviews, approvals, and project management workflows. The company targets agencies, marketing teams, enterprises, and educational institutions, positioning itself as a niche player in creative workflow management. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, though the absence of a published security policy and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, impacting trustworthiness despite the professional online presence. Overall, the website is functional, secure, and privacy-conscious but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of streamwork.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streamwork.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StreamWork operates in the technology sector with a focus on SaaS solutions for creative workflow management. Its business model relies on subscription-based software services targeting creative professionals and teams. The company demonstrates a clear market positioning with specialized services such as online proofing and approval workflows. The presence of comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages, along with active social media profiles, supports its credibility. However, the lack of physical address and phone contact details limits direct customer engagement channels. The extensive use of marketing and tracking tools suggests a strong emphasis on customer acquisition and retention. The opaque domain registration status is a notable anomaly that could affect stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements key security headers, reflecting a good security baseline. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and preparedness. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
StreamWork
Description
Simplify reviews, approvals, & project management with Streamwork, an online proofing software tailored to creative workflow management.
Key services
Online proofing, Review and approval workflows, Project management tailored for creative teams
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, HubSpot (analytics, ads, messaging, forms), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Apollo.io tracking, Hotjar, Leadsy.ai, Trovo Tag
Frameworks
Webflow, HubSpot
Platforms
Webflow hosting, HubSpot marketing platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Apollo.io, Leadsy.ai, Trovo Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Professional SaaS offering for creative teams
  3. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools
  4. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust
  6. Privacy and terms pages are present and comprehensive
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform and integrates multiple marketing and analytics technologies including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Apollo.io, and Leadsy.ai. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring modern infrastructure and reliable performance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of third-party scripts. Accessibility is basic, suggesting opportunities for improvement. The technical stack supports a professional SaaS business model but requires continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies to mitigate potential risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streamwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streamwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.