Skip to main content

Security report for streak.com

Streak · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Streak is a technology company offering a CRM solution deeply integrated into Gmail, targeting high-performing teams across sales, fundraising, hiring, support, business development, and product development. The platform emphasizes ease of use by embedding CRM functionality directly within users' inboxes, leveraging AI for data entry and natural language queries, and automating routine tasks. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, extensive use of modern web technologies, and integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS and secure practices, but could benefit from more visible security policies and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streak.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Streak occupies a niche market position as a Gmail-integrated CRM, differentiating itself from traditional CRM platforms by focusing on workflow integration and user adoption. Its business model is SaaS-based, with a focus on teams that rely heavily on email communication. The company showcases trust through testimonials and notable client logos, indicating a solid customer base. The platform's AI features and automation capabilities suggest ongoing investment in innovation. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data may be due to privacy protection or domain registration issues, which should be clarified to enhance trust. The marketing ecosystem includes multiple ad networks and tracking services, supporting a comprehensive customer acquisition strategy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses security best practices such as secure cookies and asynchronous loading of third-party scripts. The presence of Sentry indicates active error monitoring. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly visible in the HTML source, and no security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program reduces transparency for security researchers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing clear security policies and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  3. Implement and publicly disclose security policies and incident response contacts to enhance security posture and transparency.
  4. Audit third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and a formal vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Streak
Description
Streak is a CRM integrated directly into Gmail that enables teams to collaborate, manage deals, support queues, and workflows inside their inbox. It replaces multiple external systems and works securely with Google Apps.
Key services
Email tracking, Mail merge, Email sharing, Snippets, Thread splitting, Pipeline management, AI data entry, Natural language Q&A, Task management, Contact management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo Player API, Sentry (error tracking), Intercom (customer messaging), Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Outbrain, Quora Events, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Reddit Pixel, JS Cookie, Rive animations, Webflow CMS, Splitting.js, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)
Platforms
Google Apps/Gmail
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies with samesite and secure flags
  • Third-party scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Outbrain, Quora Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter Ads, Reddit Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Reddit Pixel, Quora Events
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS CRM integrated with Gmail
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or domain status
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in HTML content
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts
  5. Strong branding and customer testimonials present
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and leverages a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry for error tracking, Intercom for customer messaging, and Vimeo for video content. Animations are implemented with Rive and GSAP, enhancing user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature and well-maintained digital platform suitable for a SaaS business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streak.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streak.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.