Skip to main content

Security report for strabber.com

Strabber · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Strabber is a technology company specializing in website visitor behavior analytics, offering tools such as session replay, heatmaps, and user feedback surveys. The company targets website owners and digital professionals seeking to optimize user experience and website performance. The business operates a SaaS model with a free lifetime account offer during its beta phase, positioning itself as an emerging player in the web analytics market. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding, supporting a good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching strabber.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Strabber's market positioning focuses on providing comprehensive user behavior insights through multiple analytics modalities. Its competitive advantage lies in combining session recordings, heatmaps, and AI-generated surveys in one platform. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with an emphasis on user acquisition via free accounts. The company maintains a presence on social media and offers 24/7 support, indicating a customer-centric approach. However, direct contact information is not publicly available, which may limit some customer engagement channels. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit HTTP security headers, which are recommended best practices. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, and there is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The use of third-party tracking pixels (Facebook, Google) indicates extensive user tracking, which is partially mitigated by cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and provide incident response contact information.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Strabber
Description
Strabber provides website visitor behavior analytics including session replay, heatmaps, and user feedback surveys to help website owners understand user interactions and improve their websites.
Key services
Session replay recordings, User surveys, Heatmaps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Fonts (Poppins), Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Strabber proprietary tracking script
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Strabber proprietary session recording, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics/Google Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive session replay and user feedback analytics services.
  2. Clear navigation with dedicated product and resource sections.
  3. Legal pages are present and linked in footer and menus.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main website.
  5. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook confirmed.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking technologies.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. Cookie consent banner present with explicit consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, AOS for animations, Google Fonts, and proprietary tracking scripts. It integrates Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap with DNS servers provided by the registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low, but security-related technical improvements are recommended to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with strabber.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review strabber.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.