Skip to main content

Security report for stetson.edu

Other

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.stetson.edu is currently inaccessible beyond a Cloudflare security challenge page, which blocks direct access to its content. Due to this, no business-specific content, contact information, or policies are available for analysis. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating either a privacy protection mechanism or a misconfiguration. The site uses Cloudflare's Turnstile captcha service to mitigate malicious bot traffic, reflecting a security-conscious posture but limiting content accessibility. Without access to substantive content, the technical infrastructure appears to rely on Cloudflare's security and CDN services, but no further technology or CMS details are discernible. The security posture is partially positive due to the use of security headers and HTTPS implied by Cloudflare, but the lack of accessible policies and contact information reduces trust and compliance visibility. Overall, the site cannot be fully evaluated, and the risk assessment is limited by the WAF blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stetson.edu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests affiliation with Stetson University, an educational institution, but this cannot be confirmed from the provided data. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The absence of contact details, policies, or certifications limits insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The presence of Cloudflare protection indicates a standard security measure for a reputable organization but does not provide further business intelligence.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security services including Turnstile captcha and Content-Security-Policy headers, indicating a baseline security posture focused on bot mitigation and content security. However, the inability to access the main site content prevents assessment of other security controls such as secure forms, vulnerability management, or incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are detected in the accessible content. The lack of visible privacy, cookie, or security policies suggests potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but incomplete due to access restrictions.

Recommendations

  1. Work with Cloudflare to allow trusted scanners or users to bypass the security challenge for analysis purposes.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and security policies accessible without challenge to improve compliance and trust.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or provide verified domain registration information to enhance legitimacy.
  4. Implement accessible contact information and incident response contacts to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features once the site is accessible to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is behind a Cloudflare security challenge page (Turnstile captcha) blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare security service
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge
  2. No meaningful content or business information is accessible
  3. No contact, policy, or business data found in the HTML
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain not found in WHOIS database
  5. Only external links are to Cloudflare domains related to security challenge
  6. No forms or data collection fields detected
  7. No social media or contact information present
  8. Security headers include Content-Security-Policy
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge
  10. Website cannot be fully analyzed due to WAF blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare for security and content delivery, including the use of Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation and a strict Content-Security-Policy header. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the blocked content. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards but lacks accessible content for performance or accessibility evaluation. The presence of Cloudflare indicates robust hosting and DDoS protection but also limits direct technical inspection. Opportunities exist to improve metadata, SEO, and accessibility once the site is accessible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stetson.edu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stetson.edu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.