Skip to main content

Security report for statistikportal.li

Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung · Government · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.statistikportal.li is the official statistics portal of the Liechtenstein government, operated by the Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung. It provides comprehensive statistical data and indicators across a wide range of themes including population, economy, environment, health, education, and more. The portal targets the general public, researchers, government officials, and businesses, offering open access to official data and interactive databases. The business model is that of a government service portal, focusing on transparency and public information dissemination. The site is well-branded with consistent government identity and trust signals such as official domain and links to government sites. Technically, the website uses Pimcore CMS and incorporates Matomo analytics hosted on a government domain, indicating a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with modern web technologies in use. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and published security policies are not evident in the provided data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the domain WHOIS data aligns well with the website's government affiliation, indicating high legitimacy. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as vulnerability disclosure information, suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional government portal with good content quality and technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts to enhance security posture and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of statistikportal.li. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statistikportal.li

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung Statistikportal holds a strong market position as the official national statistics provider for Liechtenstein. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative data, government backing, and comprehensive coverage of statistical themes. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and transparency. Revenue streams are likely government-funded. The target customer segments include citizens, researchers, policymakers, and businesses requiring official statistics. Growth indicators include continuous updates and expansion of data themes. The portal integrates with partner government sites and open data platforms, forming a strategic ecosystem for data dissemination. Operationally, it maintains consistent branding and professional content, reinforcing its credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leakage is observed. The use of Matomo analytics hosted on a government domain reduces privacy risks compared to third-party trackers. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap. No published security or incident response policies were found, limiting transparency in case of security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government portal but can be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file with incident response contacts.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to obtain explicit user consent for tracking.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung
Description
Official statistics portal of the Liechtenstein government providing statistical data and indicators across various themes such as population, economy, environment, health, education, and more.
Key services
Statistical data dissemination, Interactive databases, Publications and reports, Open data access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official government statistics portal for Liechtenstein
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multiple thematic areas
  3. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  5. Use of Matomo analytics hosted on a government domain indicates privacy-conscious tracking
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  8. Website uses Pimcore CMS
  9. External links mainly to official government and open data portals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Pimcore CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses Matomo analytics hosted on a government domain, indicating a preference for privacy-friendly analytics solutions. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a clear and hierarchical navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts to reduce blocking. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. However, the absence of explicit security headers and limited metadata for SEO and social sharing could be improved. Hosting details are not explicitly available but likely government-managed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statistikportal.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statistikportal.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.