Skip to main content

Security report for statistikportal.li

Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung · Government · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.statistikportal.li is the official statistics portal of the Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung (Liechtenstein Government Administration). It provides comprehensive statistical data, indicators, and reports covering a wide range of topics including population, economy, social issues, environment, and sustainable development. The portal targets the general public, researchers, government officials, and businesses interested in official Liechtenstein statistics. The business model is a government-operated public service offering open access to data and information, positioning itself as the authoritative source for national statistics in Liechtenstein. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and SVG graphics. It uses Matomo analytics with an opt-out mechanism, indicating a moderate level of user tracking balanced with privacy considerations. The site appears to be built on the Pimcore CMS platform, with good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with a well-structured navigation system facilitating user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance and security transparency. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional government portal with high business credibility and a solid security posture. The main areas for improvement include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, providing clear security incident contacts, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statistikportal.li

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung Statistikportal serves as the official national statistics provider, offering a broad spectrum of statistical data and indicators relevant to government, businesses, and the public. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive data coverage. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service and transparency. The portal supports open data initiatives and integrates with related government sites such as the main government portal and the open data portal. Growth indicators include continuous updates of statistical indicators and expansion of thematic areas. The partnership ecosystem includes government departments and external analytics providers. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain public trust and meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong SSL configuration, and implementation of essential security headers. The use of Matomo analytics with opt-out respects user privacy better than many alternatives. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident handling. The site would benefit from formalizing these aspects to improve readiness and transparency. Overall, the security culture appears solid but could be enhanced by adding explicit documentation and contact points for security matters.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information for security incidents and designate a data protection officer to improve incident response readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance transparency by linking to certifications or compliance attestations if applicable.
  5. Regularly review and update security headers and SSL configurations to maintain high security standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung
Description
Official statistics portal of the Liechtenstein government providing statistical data, indicators, and information on various topics such as population, economy, social issues, environment, and sustainable development.
Key services
Statistical data dissemination, Interactive databases, Publications and reports, Open data portal, Indicators on sustainable development and social issues
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, SVG
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms (no visible insecure inputs)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official government statistics portal for Liechtenstein
  2. Comprehensive navigation structure covering many statistical topics
  3. Use of Matomo analytics with opt-out options
  4. No visible privacy or cookie policies on the main page
  5. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
  7. Good use of HTTPS and security headers
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses SVG for logos and icons, enhancing scalability and visual quality. The presence of Pimcore CMS is inferred from navigation element IDs and structure, indicating a robust content management system. Matomo analytics is used for tracking with asynchronous loading to minimize performance impact. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with a clear navigation hierarchy. Performance is moderate, likely due to the comprehensive content and interactive elements. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and enhancing metadata completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statistikportal.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statistikportal.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.