Skip to main content

Security report for startupland.de

STARTUPLAND · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

STARTUPLAND is a specialized event and conference organizer focusing on the founder and venture capital ecosystem primarily in Germany. The website promotes their flagship conference, targeting startups, investors, and partners within the technology sector. The business model revolves around event hosting, networking, and ticket sales, positioning itself as a niche player in the startup and VC conference market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.3, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, integrated with Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management, and uses the Brella widget for ticketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching startupland.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention startupland.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for startupland.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, organizing events that connect founders and venture capitalists. Their competitive advantage lies in their focused niche and professional event management tools like Brella. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales and partner sponsorships. The target audience includes startups, investors, and corporate partners interested in the German startup ecosystem. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates a mature digital marketing approach. However, the absence of detailed contact and legal pages suggests room for growth in corporate transparency and compliance. Partnerships are implied but not explicitly detailed in the content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of a consent management platform (Usercentrics). However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting external security engagement. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security maturity.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for transparency and support.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STARTUPLAND
Description
THE FOUNDER & VENTURE CAPITAL CONFERENCE
Key services
Conference hosting, Networking events, Ticket sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP, Brella Widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager
  • Consent management via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP, Brella Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event/conference site focused on startups and venture capital.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and consent management.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  5. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics.
  6. Brella widget used for ticketing and event management.
  7. Social media links present for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with up-to-date core version 6.8.3 and uses popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for interactivity. Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics CMP are integrated for analytics and privacy compliance. The Brella widget is embedded for ticketing functionality, indicating a reliance on third-party event management tools. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Hosting appears to be managed via domaindiscount24.net, a common registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no critical technical debt observed. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers for a more robust technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with startupland.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review startupland.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.