Skip to main content

Security report for spx.lv

SPX · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SPX is a Latvian IT service provider established in 2003, offering a broad range of IT solutions including network maintenance, cloud services, IT specialist support, software audits, and video surveillance systems. The company targets businesses seeking reliable IT infrastructure support and emphasizes certified expertise and competitive pricing. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client project showcases. Technically, the site uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the use of legacy Google Analytics and absence of visible security headers indicate areas for technical improvement. Security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but enhancements in security headers and HTTPS enforcement are recommended. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spx.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SPX operates in the Latvian technology sector, focusing on IT services for small to medium businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in certified specialists, a comprehensive service portfolio, and a decade-plus market presence. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts, cloud hosting, and training courses. The partnership with router.lv for MikroTik products and training strengthens their ecosystem. The company’s business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and customer-specific solutions. Growth indicators include a diverse client project portfolio and ongoing training offerings. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital marketing and enhance online security to build further trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with GDPR-compliant cookie consent and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of legacy analytics scripts may pose privacy risks. No incident response or security policy information is published, indicating potential gaps in transparency and preparedness. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited formal security communication channels. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but can be significantly improved by adopting modern security best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Upgrade Google Analytics to the latest GA4 or gtag.js implementation to improve privacy and performance.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with valid SSL/TLS certificates and redirect HTTP traffic.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SPX
Description
SPX provides full spectrum IT services including computer and network maintenance, cloud services, IT specialist services, software and information system audits, and weak current networks such as video surveillance. They emphasize quality, certified specialists, and competitive pricing.
Key services
Datortīklu uzturēšana (Network maintenance), Mākoņpakalpojumi (Cloud services), Datorspeciālista pakalpojumi (IT specialist services), WWW risinājumi (Web solutions), Programmatūras audits (Software audits), Videonovērošana (Video surveillance)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, Magnific Popup, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics (legacy _gaq), CookieConsent2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (legacy)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with clear Latvian language banner.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. Use of legacy Google Analytics tracking code.
  7. No visible forms on the homepage to analyze for data collection.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  9. Website uses multiple external libraries hosted on CDNJS.
  10. Business appears focused on IT services with a local Latvian market focus.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and jQuery-based plugins for UI components like carousels and popups. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs, improving performance and reliability. The cookie consent implementation is compliant and user-friendly. However, the use of legacy Google Analytics tracking (_gaq) is outdated and should be modernized. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta keywords and descriptions but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spx.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spx.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.