Skip to main content

Security report for sprinto.com

Sprinto · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sprinto is a technology company offering a continuous security and compliance automation platform targeted at fast-growing tech companies. Their platform focuses on accelerating compliance processes such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001, positioning themselves as a fast and efficient solution in the security compliance market. The website is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, supporting scalability and reliability. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain registration stable and long-standing; however, explicit security policies and privacy compliance documentation are missing from the visible content. User tracking is extensive via multiple analytics and advertising pixels, but no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy was detected, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sprinto.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sprinto.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
55
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
43
Weak passwords
5%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sprinto.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sprinto operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions for security compliance automation. Their business model revolves around delivering compliance acceleration tools to tech companies, likely generating revenue through subscriptions. The company targets fast-growing tech firms seeking to streamline compliance processes. The website content and metadata emphasize SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, which are key trust signals in their market. The domain age and hosting infrastructure suggest a stable and established business. Marketing integrations with HubSpot, Google, Facebook, and LinkedIn indicate a focus on inbound marketing and lead generation. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified in the content provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a domain status that prevents unauthorized transfers, indicating good domain security practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved to prevent DNS spoofing. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information published on the site. The presence of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risk. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of a vulnerability disclosure program, suggests gaps in compliance and transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing clear security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sprinto
Description
Sprinto is a security compliance automation platform for fast-growing tech companies that want to move fast and win big.
Key services
Security compliance automation, SOC 2, ISO 27001
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Kadence Theme, Kadence Blocks, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Scripts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), HubSpot Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, RevenueHero, UseBouncer, Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS platform for security compliance automation.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are loaded, indicating extensive user tracking.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Kadence theme and blocks.
  7. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar without privacy protection.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Kadence theme and Kadence Blocks plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management system. It uses Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization, enhancing discoverability. Hosting is likely on AWS infrastructure, as indicated by the DNS servers. The site loads multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and user engagement, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot scripts, and others. Performance is moderate, with some optimization such as lazy loading scripts. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and font loading optimizations. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from further security hardening and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sprinto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sprinto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.