Skip to main content

Security report for spolek-bison.cz

Spolek pro budování a implementaci sdílených open source nástrojů, z.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spolek pro budování a implementaci sdílených open source nástrojů, z.s. is a Czech non-profit organization focused on developing and implementing open source software tools, particularly for contract management and portals for contributory organizations. The website reflects a small, specialized entity with a clear mission targeting non-profit and public sector organizations. The technical infrastructure relies on older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2 and custom scripts for UI components like slideshows and AJAX content loading. While functional, the technology stack is outdated and could benefit from modernization to improve security and performance. Security posture is limited; no security headers or privacy policies are present, and the use of outdated libraries introduces potential vulnerabilities. The site lacks HTTPS confirmation in the provided data, which is a critical security concern. Overall, the website is accessible and provides basic contact information but lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security documentation. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spolek-bison.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit association established in 2016, focusing on open source software development for contributory organizations in the Czech Republic. Its business model centers on collaborative software development and implementation rather than commercial sales. The market position is niche and specialized, serving public and non-profit sectors. The website indicates a modest digital presence without extensive marketing or analytics tools. Partnership links include a helpdesk hosted on a related domain, suggesting some ecosystem collaboration. The absence of social media and limited contact channels may constrain outreach and growth potential. The organization appears stable with consistent domain registration and aligned business information.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low to moderate. The website uses outdated JavaScript libraries, lacks visible security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and modern security standards. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The absence of HTTPS confirmation is a critical risk. While no explicit vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the technical debt and missing security best practices expose the organization to potential threats. Enhancing security headers, updating libraries, enforcing HTTPS, and publishing privacy and security policies would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to ensure secure data transmission.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spolek pro budování a implementaci sdílených open source nástrojů, z.s.
Description
Spolek pro budování a implementaci sdílených open source nástrojů, zaměřený na vývoj a implementaci softwarových open source nástrojů, zejména evidence smluv a portál příspěvkových organizací.
Key services
vývoj open source softwaru, implementace softwarových nástrojů, evidence smluv, portál pro příspěvkové organizace
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, piroBox, supersized slideshow, overlib AJAX, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • image protection via JS (disables right click and dragging)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email in the footer.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  5. Technical stack uses outdated jQuery version, which poses security risks.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links or presence found.
  8. Content is focused on open source software development for non-profit organizations.
  9. No security headers detected; SSL status unknown from provided data.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs legacy JavaScript libraries and custom scripts for UI features like slideshows and AJAX content loading. The use of Google Fonts enhances typography but no modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Hosting is managed via Czech registrar REG-INTERNET-CZ with Forpsi name servers, indicating local hosting. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal with meta keywords and description but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks modern responsive design elements and accessibility enhancements, suggesting opportunities for modernization and improved user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spolek-bison.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spolek-bison.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.