The website www.splitted-desktop.com serves as an informational resource focused on cloud computing, infrastructure, data centers, and cloud security. It targets IT professionals and technology enthusiasts seeking expert insights in these domains. The site offers a range of articles and blog posts covering foundational and emerging topics in cloud technology. The business model appears to be content publishing without direct commercial transactions or services. The market position is that of a niche technology blog with a small-scale operation.
Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 5.3 and jQuery 2.2.4, ensuring responsive design and a good user experience across devices. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation and relevant meta tags for SEO. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with basic accessibility features.
From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS/SSL confirmation and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring trust. There is no cookie consent mechanism or comprehensive privacy compliance indicators beyond a basic privacy policy page. Contact information is minimal, limited to a single email address, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Overall, while the website provides valuable content and a professional appearance, the lack of domain registration transparency and security best practices present moderate risks. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility are recommended to enhance trust and reduce potential vulnerabilities.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention splitted-desktop.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for splitted-desktop.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website operates as a small-scale technology content publisher specializing in cloud computing and infrastructure topics. Its competitive advantage lies in focused, expert-driven content catering to a specialized audience of IT professionals and cloud enthusiasts. The business model is informational, likely monetized indirectly through content engagement rather than direct sales. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company affiliations. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal contact and social media presence. The site’s ecosystem is self-contained without visible integration with external business partners or service providers.
Security posture
The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of HTTPS/SSL confirmation, lack of security headers, and no visible mechanisms for cookie consent or GDPR compliance. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices appear minimal, with only a basic privacy policy present. The security culture is not evident from the website content, and no certifications or trust seals are displayed. These gaps could expose the site and its users to risks such as data interception, privacy violations, and reputational damage.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and ensure all site content is served securely.
Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Develop and display a comprehensive cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
Publish terms of service, security policy, and vulnerability disclosure pages to enhance transparency and incident readiness.
Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Discover expert insights on cloud computing, infrastructure, data centers, and security.
Key services
Cloud Computing insights, Cloud Infrastructure information, Data Center knowledge, Open Compute Project education, Cloud Security fundamentals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.0, jQuery 2.2.4
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
40/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active .com domain.
No HTTPS or SSL information available from provided data; security headers not detected.
No cookie consent or terms of service pages found.
Contact information limited to a single email address in footer.
No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
No social media links detected.
Website uses modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery.
Content is focused on cloud computing and infrastructure topics.
No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 5.3 and jQuery 2.2.4, providing responsive design and a good user interface. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and canonical links. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform, and hosting details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. There is no integration of analytics or advertising technologies, indicating minimal tracking and data collection.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with splitted-desktop.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review splitted-desktop.com.